SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the when-elephants-argue-it-is-hard-on-the-ants dept.
Protest in Tehran after Saudis execute Shiite cleric Nimr al-Nimr
Saudi Arabia said Saturday it had executed 47 people in a single day, including a dissident Shiite cleric, Nimr al-Nimr, who had repeatedly spoken out against the government and the Saudi royal family.
Nimr had been convicted of inciting sectarian strife, sedition and other charges following his 2012 arrest.
Iran, Saudi Arabia's regional rival, summoned the Saudi ambassador in Tehran to condemn the execution, the state-run IRNA news agency reported. The Shiite-majority nation issued a statement deploring the execution and warning that Saudi Arabia would pay a heavy price for its policies.
Iranian Protesters Ransack Saudi Embassy After Execution of Shiite Cleric
Iranian protesters ransacked and set fire to the Saudi Embassy in Tehran on Saturday after Saudi Arabia executed an outspoken Shiite cleric who had criticized the kingdom's treatment of its Shiite minority.
The executions coincided with increased attacks in Saudi Arabia by the jihadists of the Islamic State and an escalating rivalry between the Sunni monarchy and Shiite Iran that is playing out in conflicts in Syria, Yemen and elsewhere. Sheikh Nimr was an outspoken critic of the Saudi monarchy and was adopted as a symbolic leader by Shiite protesters in several Persian Gulf countries during the Arab Spring uprisings.
[More after the break.]
Saudi Arabia cuts ties with Iran as row over cleric's death escalates
Saudi Arabia cut ties with Iran on Sunday, responding to the storming of its embassy in Tehran in an escalating row between the rival Middle East powers over Riyadh's execution of a Shi'ite Muslim cleric.
Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir told a news conference in Riyadh that the envoy of Shi'ite Iran had been asked to quit Saudi Arabia within 48 hours. The kingdom, he said, would not allow the Islamic republic to undermine its security.
Jubeir said the attack in Tehran was in line with what he said were earlier Iranian assaults on foreign embassies there and with Iranian policies of destabilizing the region by creating "terrorist cells" in Saudi Arabia.Speaking on Iranian state television, Deputy Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian said in Tehran's first response that by cutting diplomatic ties, Riyadh could not cover up "its major mistake of executing Sheikh Nimr".
The United States, Saudi Arabia's biggest backer in the West, responded by encouraging diplomatic engagement and calling for leaders in the region to take "affirmative steps" to reduce tensions
So what do you think; Is this another normal spat between regional leaders looking for their interest on the region, or a signal of worse things to come?
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @11:00PM
The Saudi's are a bunch of selfish assholes anyways. They don't seem to be helping with this whole Syrian Refugee thing, or with the fight against ISIL (ISIS, or whatever the fuck they are being called this week), so I have little sympathy for them starting shit.
Just a question: Are there ANY primarily Muslim countries that are peaceful, prosperous, and generous? I certainly can't think of any. A couple may be prosperous (for a few people) but only because they happened to be sitting on an ass-ton of oil, not through their own actions.
Please prove me wrong.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @11:09PM
Let's rephrase one line here.
Because we're certainly not without ensuring we make money out of our prosperity and generosity, or that they conform exactly to our system of governance, or that they believe the fairy tales we heard as kids, or if the color of your skin is not a shade of white, shall I go on?
(Score: 2, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @03:45AM
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Existential_fallacy [wikipedia.org]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_conclusion_from_a_negative_premise [wikipedia.org]
You are trying to tie religion to war. I can think of a few countries that are not religious in any way that seem to be stirring up the silt as it were. You are debating from a false position that you want to push.
(Score: 1, Touché) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @11:10PM
Why all this saudi hate, it's not like they flew air planes into twin towers... oh wait.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 05 2016, @11:54PM
Ok, I will. You're wrong. Flat out. 100%. Completely and without a doubt wrong.
Full Disclosure:
This post was given the exact same about of actual thought and knowledge you used to formulate the parent post, I.E. none.
No follow ups. No proofs. Just words on a screen that agree/disagree with the words I see on my screen.
(Score: 4, Informative) by GungnirSniper on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:08AM
You are correct on these points. The Saudis already have the Wahhabi mindset in significant sections of their society, so they don't want to add to it. Fighting against ISIS would only inflame their internal tensions. Iran and the Yemeni rebels are both Shia where Saudi Arabia is Shi'ite so they can be battled without generating major internal security concerns.
Indonesia would probably be the best example of a modern and stable majority-Muslim state. While it does have oil it doesn't rely on it to the degree the Saudis or even the Iranians do.
As for being generous, and taking refugees, none of the Islamic countries want these potentially-terrorist people among them. Charity and refugee assistance are stronger values in the West than in the Islamic world, it would appear. So that would seem to be a real issue. Many of these economic migrants aren't from the warzones, but from economically restricted areas where government corruption is rife.
The single best thing we could do is to tie our aid to the cutting of red tape. Otherwise we need to avoid getting in the middle of a potential sectarian war.
Tips for better submissions to help our site grow. [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:38AM
> Charity and refugee assistance are stronger values in the West than in the Islamic world,
Er no. Germany doesn't want them out of charity, they need them because their population growth is negative with the lowest birthrate in the world. [bbc.com]
The west isn't any more charitable, you are just more easily swayed by western propaganda.
(Score: 1) by segwonk on Wednesday January 06 2016, @06:32AM
Yes, Iran is Shia.
No, they are Sunni. Mostly, anyway. About 10-15% of Saudis are Shia.
.......go til ya know.
(Score: 2) by GungnirSniper on Thursday January 07 2016, @05:59PM
You're correct, the Saudis are overwhelmingly Sunni. Their Shia population is mostly in their southwestern tip.
Tips for better submissions to help our site grow. [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by bootsy on Wednesday January 06 2016, @03:59PM
Indonesia is also a really big country population wise. The 4th most populous in the world in fact.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependencies_by_population [wikipedia.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @06:10PM
You might want to ask the East Timorese how peaceful the Indonesians can be.
(Score: 4, Informative) by edIII on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:09AM
I believe the kingdom of Jordan (98.8% Muslim) qualifies as any:
It is a major tourist destination in the region and is especially popular with expat westerners seeking to live or study in its capital Amman.[14] Not only is the Kingdom considered the safest country in the Middle East, but also considered as the safest Arab country .[15] In midst of surrounding turmoil it has been greatly hospitable, accepting refugees from almost all surrounding conflicts as early as 1948, with most notably the estimated 2 million Palestinian refugees and the 1.5 million Syrian refugees residing in the country.[16] Jordan continues to demonstrate hospitality, despite the substantial strain the Syrian refugees are holding on national systems and infrastructure.[17] It is also the only safe refuge available to thousands of Iraqi Christians fleeing the Islamic State .[18] Pope Benedict described Jordan during his 2009 visit to the Holy Land as a model for Christian-Muslim co-existence.[19] 30% of population was Christian in 1950, however, due to many reasons (mainly the high rates of Muslim immigration) this percentage plummeted down to 6% in 2015.[20]
Although Jordan is a constitutional monarchy, the king holds wide executive and legislative powers. Jordan is classified as a country of "high human development"[9] by the 2014 Human Development Report . Jordan has an "upper middle income" economy.[21] Jordan enjoys "advanced status" with the European Union since December 2010,[22] and it is a member of the Euro-Mediterranean free trade area. It is also a founding member of the Arab League[23] and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC). The country is one of the top ten largest contributors to UN Peacekeeping troops.[24] Jordan has a well developed medical sector, making it a medical tourism destination . Also it has one of the world's highest life expectancies, over 80 years ranking it as the second highest in the entire MENA region .[25] Although Jordan has very few natural resources, it has large investments, the reason behind this is the country's highly skilled workforce .[26]
Jordan is quite modern in fact (in some areas better than the U.S by far), and Muslim people have given us important contributions to Geometry, Algebra, and Trigonometry historically. Nothing actually precludes Muslims from being peaceful, prosperous, and generous intrinsically. Jordan proves that.
All of that being said, yes, the Saudis and ruling family are a bunch of selfish assholes. That only speaks to that kingdom, and the people who put up with it, not the entire Muslim world.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:46AM
Wikipedia is not a valid source. Anyone can edit it and thus it should and will be ignored. I question your bias by stating that Muslim people gave us Geometry and Trig. Algebra yes, but the rest belong to the Greeks.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:12AM
Whoa now, I just edited Wikipedia and it says Wikipedia is extremely reliable.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:29AM
What does it matter if Muslims developed algebra in the middle ages? That was centuries ago. The West developed calculus, split the atom, went to the moon, and much more since then, things that Muslims did not do first nor on their own (up until 1979, the US was helping Iran develop its nuclear capabilities for peaceful purposes).
People keep bringing up algebra, one contribution from hundreds of years ago; is it because the Muslims haven't done anything worthwhile or relevant since then?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:43AM
They've been contributing to global population control you insensitive clod!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @04:52AM
From a species wide sense, we do have a serious population issue. If we don't get it under control, arguing about who invented math systems will be irrelevant as we regress back to the paleolithic or worse.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @04:10AM
Looks like someone is censoring anything they disagree with here, just like Wikipedia editors.
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Wednesday January 06 2016, @09:03AM
Not only that but the King is a Trekkie who was actually in one episide
(Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:15PM
He was also a ham radio operator with the ridiculous callsign JY1 (JY=Jordan and 1 is number 1). Unfortunately "was" he's been dead a decade or at least many years now. I never talked to him but he was reported to be a nice down to earth kinda guy, for a king.
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:59PM
That was the last King (Abdullah). The current king (Abdullah II) was the prince when He was on voyager [wikia.com]. For a non-speaking extra it's a pretty long article!
(Score: 2) by isostatic on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:00PM
Sorry, no, the last king was Hussein, not Abdulllah. It was his father who was Abdullah (1st)
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @12:43AM
You aren't wrong. The "generous" part is what disqualifies most. The ones that are prosperous are indeed selfish. The ones that are generous are indeed not prosperous.
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Iran, just about everybody with a regional interest that isn't a western nation either cant or wont help Syrian refugees for all the same reason: they want the refugees to die. It's a proxy war between shia, sunni, kurds, and turks. Every country under Islamic law has a large population of refugees they would rather just let die and so that is precisely what they are doing. Russia is even playing the part of useful idiot by bombing indiscriminately.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Wednesday January 06 2016, @01:01PM
Turkey
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday January 06 2016, @02:56PM
Turkey at least on paper is secular. Also, I'm not sure how well they're doing.