Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday January 08 2016, @07:13AM   Printer-friendly
from the printster-will-be-the-new-napster dept.

Remember Napster or Grokster? Both services allowed users to share computer files – usually digital music – that infringed the copyrights for those songs.

Now imagine that, instead of music, you could download a physical object. Sounds like something from a sci-fi movie – push a button and there's the item! But that scenario is already becoming a reality. With a 3D printer, someone can download a computer file, called a computer-aided design (CAD) file, that instructs the printer to make a physical, three-dimensional object.

Because CAD files are digital, they can be shared across the internet on file-sharing services, just like movies and music. Just as digital media challenged the copyright system with rampant copyright infringement, the patent system likely will encounter widespread infringement of patented inventions through 3D printing. The problem is, however, that the patent system is even more ill-equipped to deal with this situation than copyright law was, posing a challenge to a key component of our innovation system.

If 3-D printing at home happened fast enough it would cut China off at the knees.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday January 08 2016, @06:29PM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday January 08 2016, @06:29PM (#286761) Homepage
    I don't look at labels much, but of the items of clothing of which I do know the origin, there are more "Made in the Filipines" than "Made in China". China does not seem to be hurting because of this, and clothing/textiles are a bigger chunk of their exports.

    Most of my cheap electronic shit is from China. I fail to see how being able to cheaply 3D-print casings in non-China is going to decrease the number of crappy digital thermometers, or LED dimmer switches, or phone chargers that come out of China; and all those things will still be housed in chinese plastic, because injection molding will always be cheaper than 3D-printing. So I see no impact at all on china from such availability.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday January 08 2016, @10:54PM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday January 08 2016, @10:54PM (#286980) Journal

    I have lots of old electronics. I'm sure within them is more than sufficient material (plastic, silicon, etc) to recycle into a new device. If I could do that, why would I buy anything from China (or anywhere else for that matter)? I could throw that old zipdisk drive and about half a dozen old smartphones into a hopper, let it chew through and sort that, and re-extrude it as feedstock, and run that through a 3-D printer to produce whatever new object I give it the CAD file for.

    Obviously it is not currently possible to automatically sort so many disparate materials, but it is possible to do that with single materials like PLA. Maybe you don't see the value in that, but I sure do. Instead of having closets and basements full of old boards I might cannibalize parts from for later projects, I could chuck them all into the hopper to print out whatever I want on demand. When my 5-yr old drops a plate, I wouldn't have to run out to Crate&Barrel to get another one, but instead could throw the pieces into the hopper and print out a new plate, no trip to the store, no expenditure necessary. That sums up to lost sale for $COUNTRY.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday January 08 2016, @11:24PM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday January 08 2016, @11:24PM (#286990) Homepage
      Living in a country covered with trees, and with a huge paper industry, almost all of the bog roll in the supermarkets came from a far off foreign country, requiring the crossing of 3 international land borders and one international container ferry.

      If you think the mere presence of a material locally will make all stuff made locally from that material cheaper than stuff imported, then you know nothing about economics. In particular, you seem to think that time is free.

      However, please continue bringing down the Chinese economy by fixing up your own plates, every little helps.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves