Remember Napster or Grokster? Both services allowed users to share computer files – usually digital music – that infringed the copyrights for those songs.
Now imagine that, instead of music, you could download a physical object. Sounds like something from a sci-fi movie – push a button and there's the item! But that scenario is already becoming a reality. With a 3D printer, someone can download a computer file, called a computer-aided design (CAD) file, that instructs the printer to make a physical, three-dimensional object.
Because CAD files are digital, they can be shared across the internet on file-sharing services, just like movies and music. Just as digital media challenged the copyright system with rampant copyright infringement, the patent system likely will encounter widespread infringement of patented inventions through 3D printing. The problem is, however, that the patent system is even more ill-equipped to deal with this situation than copyright law was, posing a challenge to a key component of our innovation system.
If 3-D printing at home happened fast enough it would cut China off at the knees.
(Score: 2) by TheReaperD on Saturday January 09 2016, @12:23AM
I have a problem with one of the assertions of the article: "posing a challenge to a key component of our innovation system". The copyright and patent system has not been about innovation for many years. These days, the system is designed to protect corporate profits, not innovation. There was a time when the system made sense but, Disney destroyed all value of copyright to society and the pharmaceutical industry has been pretty effective at doing the same for patents, though not up to Disney's mastery for destroying all societal value in the name of corporate profits.
Ad eundum quo nemo ante iit