Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday January 08 2016, @05:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the such-a-thing-as-too-tolerant dept.

Tensions Rise in Germany Over Handling of Mass Sexual Assaults in Cologne

The Guardian reports:

A ferocious debate has erupted in Germany over the handling of mass sexual assaults and muggings carried out by groups of young males during New Year's Eve celebrations in Cologne, amid accusations of a police and media cover-up over fears of whipping up anti-foreigner sentiment in the wake of the migrant crisis.

About 100 complaints have now been made to police, two-thirds of which are linked to sexual assault, including two rapes. According to police and witnesses, the perpetrators were of north African and Arab appearance, although neither the identity nor origin of any of them has so far been established.

If you're not already feeling queasy enough be sure to read the link "Asian sex-grooming gangs in the UK" in the article. Apparently you can find similar stories from all over the UK, these sexual crimes against underage girls perpetrated by muslims are sickeningly common.

Conspiracy of Silence - or Sensationalist Reporting?

There are a number of marginal news sites posting stories out of Europe these days, mostly from Germany, Sweden, as well as other claims made regarding Finland and the UK. The claims all center around a huge increase in rapes by immigrants, outright take over of public train stations, and mass groping of women passing through the stations.

According to these reports, the incidents started in midsummer and continue to this day, but the local news organizations have refused to publish reports of these incidents even after arrests have been made. Often police are accused of withholding the news of any complaints or arrests for months.

The clear implication, more often implied than stated is that the national leaders who went public in their pledges to accept refugees from the middle east war zones as well as northern Africa are leaning on main stream news outlets to suppress news reports of these rapes and sexual assaults. This suppression, if it exists, also appears to extend to the US press.

The assaults aren't limited to European women, but also include women in the immigrant shelters, some as young as 16. The immigrant shelters population in Munich is 80% male. But not all the alleged perpetrators are migrants from the recent wave of mass migrations over the summer and fall. Some are earlier immigrants from North Africa who don't necessarily live in the camps.

Finally some reports are leaking into the western press in the US, such as this brief report in the New York Times about events on New Years Eve. That same event was reported by a couple of the British tabloids.

Many reports are in German, Here and Here. (Google Translate does well with these pages). Others are in English such as this one and this one.

Are any Soylentils living in the EU near refugee centers seeing these problems? Is it being reported? Is it being repressed? Or is the whole thing a made up issue by biased articles in fringe news sites?


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Saturday January 09 2016, @03:53AM

    by NotSanguine (285) <NotSanguineNO@SPAMSoylentNews.Org> on Saturday January 09 2016, @03:53AM (#287128) Homepage Journal

    please cite that basic tenet of the Republic which I am opposing.

    My comment has zero to do with Emma Lazarus' poem. Rather, it has to do with the individual rights ensconced in the U.S. Constitution and the amendmens thereto. James Madison expounds on this in the Federalist Papers (#51) [billofrightsinstitute.org]:

    It is of great importance in a republic not only to guard the society against the oppression of its rulers but to guard one part of the society against the injustice of the other part. If a majority be united by a common interest, the rights of the minority will be insecure.
    There are but two methods of providing against this evil: the one by creating a will in the community independent of the majority that is, of the society itself; the other, by comprehending in the society so many separate descriptions of citizens as will render an unjust combination of a majority of the whole very improbable, if not impracticable. The first method prevails in all governments possessing an hereditary or self-appointed authority. This, at best, is but a precarious security; because a power independent of the society may as well espouse the unjust views of the major, as the rightful interests of the minor party, and may possibly be turned against both parties. The second method will be exemplified in the federal republic of the United States. Whilst all authority in it will be derived from and dependent on the society, the society itself will be broken into so many parts, interests, and classes of citizens, that the rights of individuals, or of the minority, will be in little danger from interested combinations of the majority.

    This is discussed, in great detail, in a wide variety of forums. Here are a few from the first page of a google search [google.com]:
    http://www.aclunv.org/blog/preventing-tyranny-majority-original-plan [aclunv.org]
    http://www.garlikov.com/philosophy/majorityrule.htm [garlikov.com]
    http://www.rense.com/general64/madi.htm [rense.com]
    http://billofrightsinstitute.org/founding-documents/primary-source-documents/the-federalist-papers/federalist-papers-no-51/ [billofrightsinstitute.org]

    There is nothing in the constitution that can be interpreted as welcoming invading hordes from a hostile culture or civilization.

    True enough. However, that's not what we're talking about here. Immigration is not invasion, except to xenophobes, religious nutjobs and bigots. All of those labels, IMHO, apply to you.

    tl;dr: You're talking out of your ass and it smells that way too.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday January 09 2016, @02:53PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday January 09 2016, @02:53PM (#287266) Homepage Journal

    Outsiders who want to come in are not "part of society". They are outsiders who wish to gain entry into your society. The constitution wasn't written for those outsiders. In view of the fact that MOST Americans aren't welcoming these people into our midst, yes, they are invaders, not immigrants.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.