El Reg reports
The US Copyright Office is asking the tech industry and members of the public to comment about the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), and in particular the rules governing copyright infringement.
Section 512 of the DMCA gives ISPs and internet hosts immunity from prosecution if material that infringes copyright, such as music tracks, is taken down promptly if the entity owning the rights to it protests. "Repeat infringers" are penalized.
[...] The DMCA was signed into law in 1998, and since then flaws have been consistently pointed out in the legislation, not least with section 512. So the Copyright Office wants to know how to improve things.
"The Office will consider the costs and burdens of the notice-and-takedown process on large- and small-scale copyright owners, online service providers, and the general public", the request reads.
"The Office will also review how successfully section 512 addresses online infringement and protects against improper takedown notices. To aid in this effort, and to provide thorough assistance to Congress, the Office is seeking public input on a number of key questions."
In the request for responses, the Office posits 28 questions it would like answered, including how the legislation is working in practice, what legal precedents are affecting its operation, and whether takedown notices are effective. It also asks for any academic studies on the matter.
[...] The guidelines for submissions will be posted on February 1 and the open period for comments ends on March 21, so there's plenty of time to get a submission ready. How much good this will do, however, remains to be seen.
(Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Sunday January 10 2016, @01:23AM
If you get rid of copyright, nobody could make a living writing. You would have a LOT less good art, music, or literature.
Da Vinci, Michelanglo, Handel, Bach, Shakespeare, Chaucer... wouldn't have created anything?
I'm not saying we shouldn't have copyright; I am saying that the current length of protection is far too long (by over a century in some jurisdictions) and the restrictions on personal use are truly insane. I am also saying that copyright isn't the only way of compensating writers, composers, sculptors, painters, coders, teachers...
It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
(Score: 2) by mcgrew on Wednesday January 13 2016, @04:29PM
If you got rid of copyright the rich would have culture and no one else. But I agree that copyright lengths are WAY too long. I'd like to see the Bono Act repealed.
Carbon, The only element in the known universe to ever gain sentience