Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday January 10 2016, @02:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the those-bastards dept.

The Forbes 30 Under 30 list came out this week and it featured a prominent security researcher. Other researchers were pleased to see one of their own getting positive attention, and visited the site in droves to view the list.

On arrival, like a growing number of websites, Forbes asked readers to turn off ad blockers in order to view the article. After doing so, visitors were immediately served with pop-under malware, primed to infect their computers, and likely silently steal passwords, personal data and banking information. Or, as is popular worldwide with these malware "exploit kits," lock up their hard drives in exchange for Bitcoin ransom. The exploit used was a version of hackenfreude.

Forbes has recently taken some flack from Soylent News readers for its heavy-handed approach to ad blockers.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Sunday January 10 2016, @03:11PM

    by Nerdfest (80) on Sunday January 10 2016, @03:11PM (#287623)

    Not a big loss in this case either. They're pretty much just an Apple advertising site when it comes to tech for the last couple of years.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Redundant) by frojack on Sunday January 10 2016, @07:22PM

    by frojack (1554) on Sunday January 10 2016, @07:22PM (#287716) Journal

    You've seen ads on Forbes? You're doing it wrong.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    • (Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Sunday January 10 2016, @09:29PM

      by Nerdfest (80) on Sunday January 10 2016, @09:29PM (#287790)

      I run ad and script blockers. I'm referring to their 'content'. The Verge is even worse.

      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Sunday January 10 2016, @10:38PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Sunday January 10 2016, @10:38PM (#287847) Journal

        Yeah, the content is the ad. It's the print equivalent of product placements on TV or in film.

        FWIW, the same is rapidly becoming true of a lot of online apps/sites, too. I uninstalled Flipboard on my phone when the ratio of product placements to actual articles exceeded 50%.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.