Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday January 13 2016, @07:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the making-foss-tools-even-easier-to-use dept.

Hackaday reports:

One barrier for those wanting to switch over from EAGLE [software for producing printed circuit boards] to KiCAD has been the lack of a way to convert existing projects from one [file format] to the other. An Eagle to KiCad ULP [User Language Program] exists, but it only converts the schematic--albeit with errors and hence not too helpful. And, for quite some time, KiCad has been able to open Eagle .brd layout files. But without a netlist to read and check for errors, that's not too useful either.

[Lachlan] has written a comprehensive set of Eagle to KiCad ULP scripts to convert schematics, symbols, and footprints. Board conversion is still done using KiCad's built in converter, since it works quite well.

Overall, the process works pretty well, and we were able to successfully convert two projects from Eagle. The entire process took only about 10 to 15 minutes of clean up after running the scripts.

The five scripts and one include file run sequentially once the first one is run. [Lachlan]'s scripts will convert Eagle multi-sheet .sch to KiCad multi-sheets, place global and local net labels for multi sheets, convert multi part symbols, build KiCad footprint modules and symbol libraries from Eagle libraries, create a project directory to store all the converted files, and perform basic error checking.

The Eagle 6.xx PCB files can be directly imported to KiCad. The scripts also convert [Vias] to Pads, which helps with KiCad's flood fill when [Vias] have no connections. This part requires some manual intervention and post processing. There are detailed instructions on [Lachlan]'s GitHub repository and he also walks through the process in the video.

Previous KiCAD-related stories


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Unixnut on Sunday January 17 2016, @11:32AM

    by Unixnut (5779) on Sunday January 17 2016, @11:32AM (#290675)

    Aaah, the funding makes the whole situation have a lot more sense now. I know that for OSS, the "free time" to develop and refine the software is inversely proportional to having a job. Since I started working my OSS projects have unfortunately stagnated, so I can't complain really when other OSS meets the same fate. Rare is it that people will pay you to develop your OSS project, so good on the KiCAD team.

    Still, I wonder why CERN decided to fund them, when there were more developed OSS EDAs out there at the time, which just needed polish. My experience with GEDA over the years is some odd bugs when saving or resizing, and a library that is quite messy and out of date. Apart from that it is my tool of choice for hobby work. With regular funding it could have really done well, but I guess it was not to be :-(

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2