Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday January 15 2016, @01:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe-'cuz-they-can't-justify-it dept.

UK Home Secretary Theresa May was grilled on Wednesday during the last evidence session held by the Parliamentary committee scrutinizing fresh powers proposed for GCHQ.

Crucially, she was unable to explain to the panel exactly why Blighty's intelligence services need the ability to intercept and retain millions of innocent Britons' data in bulk, as well carry out bulk hacking operations, which would be strongly authorised if draft law – the Investigatory Powers Bill (IPB) – is passed.

While the joint committee was pleased that GCHQ's bulk surveillance and hacking operations are being brought completely within parliamentary reign for the first time, having previously been effected through royal prerogative, the panel noted that the agency's sweeping powers have not yet been justified in operational terms.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/01/13/theresa_may/

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday January 15 2016, @07:26PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday January 15 2016, @07:26PM (#290000)

    What would happen if a nail showed up? Are you soft on nails?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday January 15 2016, @09:57PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Friday January 15 2016, @09:57PM (#290035)

    Borrow your neighbor's hammer

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday January 15 2016, @10:10PM

      by bob_super (1357) on Friday January 15 2016, @10:10PM (#290038)

      The whole house could fall apart in the time it takes to get their hammer.
      is that what you want, you evilmonger? The complete downfall of everything we ever built, at the hands of some rogue nail, because we were to weak to maintain our own full-scale hammering capabilities?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2016, @10:16PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 15 2016, @10:16PM (#290041)

        Worse than the house falling down, if we sell off the hammer, the wife will start to question our other tool purchases! Nobody's touching my Dewalt biscuit joiner. I really liked it the one time I used it.

        • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday January 15 2016, @11:12PM

          by tangomargarine (667) on Friday January 15 2016, @11:12PM (#290054)

          That's an actual thing?!

          The burning question is whether they use American or British biscuits ("cookies").

          --
          "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
      • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday January 15 2016, @11:09PM

        by tangomargarine (667) on Friday January 15 2016, @11:09PM (#290053)

        Yeah, we'd much rather stare at a nail, flexing and raising our hammer, only to find out hours later it was actually a bolt.

        ...and then hammer it anyway just for the fuck of it.

        --
        "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"