Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Wednesday February 03 2016, @08:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the GATTACA dept.

A few weeks into sixth grade, Colman Chadam had to leave school because of his DNA.

The situation, odd as it may sound, played out like this. Colman has genetic markers for cystic fibrosis, and kids with the inherited lung disease can't be near each other because they're vulnerable to contagious infections. Two siblings with cystic fibrosis also attended Colman's middle school in Palo Alto, California in 2012. So Colman was out, even though he didn't actually have the disease, according to a lawsuit that his parents filed against the school district. The allegation? Genetic discrimination.

Yes, genetic discrimination. Get used to those two words together, because they're likely to become a lot more common. With DNA tests now cheap and readily available, the number of people getting tests has gone way up—along with the potential for discrimination based on the results. When Colman's school tried to transfer him based on his genetic status, the lawsuit alleges, the district violated the Americans With Disabilities Act and Colman's First Amendment right to privacy. "This is the test case," says the Chadam's lawyer, Stephen Jaffe.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday February 04 2016, @01:32AM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday February 04 2016, @01:32AM (#298807)

    Oh, but invoking conspiracy is fun. If "low hanging fruit" were the true motivator for developing health improvement technology, clean drinking water (ala DEKA Slingshot) would have been conquered 20 years ago, or more. There are tons of relatively easy to cure diseases that happen to be difficult to monetize for one reason or another, so instead we develop cancer therapy machines that cost tens of millions of dollars, because the payers in those markets have deep pockets.

    --
    Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://news.stanford.edu/2023/02/17/will-russia-ukraine-war-end
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday February 04 2016, @03:51AM

    by Immerman (3985) on Thursday February 04 2016, @03:51AM (#298857)

    You don't even need a conspiracy - that implies people working together to suppress a cure. All you really need is a capitalist medical infrastructure. You have $X to invest in medical research, for the purpose of turning a profit. Which sounds like it will give you the best return on investment?

    A treatment that will potentially eliminate the targeted disease from the planet
    A treatment that could save the lives of millions of people who can't afford to pay for it
    A treatment that improves the lives of wealthy patients so long as they keep taking it regularly

    If you chose A or B, congratulations, you're a decent human being. Enjoy the warm feeling that brings to your heart, and leave your bank account by the door when you leave, because you clearly don't have what it takes to get rich.

    • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday February 04 2016, @02:05PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday February 04 2016, @02:05PM (#298965)

      that implies people working together to suppress a cure. All you really need is a capitalist medical infrastructure

      Put on your philosopher's hat and see if you can draw a meaningful distinction between a "capitalist infrastructure" and "people working together to suppress less profitable endeavors."

      --
      Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://news.stanford.edu/2023/02/17/will-russia-ukraine-war-end
      • (Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday February 04 2016, @02:25PM

        by Immerman (3985) on Thursday February 04 2016, @02:25PM (#298969)

        Try your own hat and see if you can come up with a meaningful distinction between collaboration and conspiracy.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 04 2016, @03:09PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 04 2016, @03:09PM (#298982)

        Put on your philosopher's hat and see if you can draw a meaningful distinction between a "capitalist infrastructure" and "people working together to suppress less profitable endeavors."

        That's easy:

        capitalist infrastructure:
        Each one for himself makes the decision, without coordinating with the others. Market forces ensure they come to the same decision.
        people working together to suppress less profitable endeavours:
        They all coordinate and come to an agreement.
        • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday February 04 2016, @10:20PM

          by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday February 04 2016, @10:20PM (#299191)

          That's easy:

          capitalist infrastructure:
          Each one for himself makes the decision, without coordinating with the others. Market forces ensure they come to the same decision.

          people working together to suppress less profitable endeavours:
          They all coordinate and come to an agreement.

          So, if all the major players in a market independently decide to raise prices at the same time - that's not collusion or price fixing, but if they are observed communicating with each other about it it is?

          There is so much availability and exchange of information in today's markets that everyone is effectively communicating with everyone else, regardless of whether or not they ever meet face to face, or exchange e-mails or telephone calls.

          --
          Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://news.stanford.edu/2023/02/17/will-russia-ukraine-war-end