SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A few weeks into sixth grade, Colman Chadam had to leave school because of his DNA.
The situation, odd as it may sound, played out like this. Colman has genetic markers for cystic fibrosis, and kids with the inherited lung disease can't be near each other because they're vulnerable to contagious infections. Two siblings with cystic fibrosis also attended Colman's middle school in Palo Alto, California in 2012. So Colman was out, even though he didn't actually have the disease, according to a lawsuit that his parents filed against the school district. The allegation? Genetic discrimination.
Yes, genetic discrimination. Get used to those two words together, because they're likely to become a lot more common. With DNA tests now cheap and readily available, the number of people getting tests has gone way up—along with the potential for discrimination based on the results. When Colman's school tried to transfer him based on his genetic status, the lawsuit alleges, the district violated the Americans With Disabilities Act and Colman's First Amendment right to privacy. "This is the test case," says the Chadam's lawyer, Stephen Jaffe.
(Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday February 04 2016, @03:51AM
You don't even need a conspiracy - that implies people working together to suppress a cure. All you really need is a capitalist medical infrastructure. You have $X to invest in medical research, for the purpose of turning a profit. Which sounds like it will give you the best return on investment?
A treatment that will potentially eliminate the targeted disease from the planet
A treatment that could save the lives of millions of people who can't afford to pay for it
A treatment that improves the lives of wealthy patients so long as they keep taking it regularly
If you chose A or B, congratulations, you're a decent human being. Enjoy the warm feeling that brings to your heart, and leave your bank account by the door when you leave, because you clearly don't have what it takes to get rich.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday February 04 2016, @02:05PM
that implies people working together to suppress a cure. All you really need is a capitalist medical infrastructure
Put on your philosopher's hat and see if you can draw a meaningful distinction between a "capitalist infrastructure" and "people working together to suppress less profitable endeavors."
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://news.stanford.edu/2023/02/17/will-russia-ukraine-war-end
(Score: 2) by Immerman on Thursday February 04 2016, @02:25PM
Try your own hat and see if you can come up with a meaningful distinction between collaboration and conspiracy.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 04 2016, @03:09PM
That's easy:
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Thursday February 04 2016, @10:20PM
That's easy:
capitalist infrastructure:
Each one for himself makes the decision, without coordinating with the others. Market forces ensure they come to the same decision.
people working together to suppress less profitable endeavours:
They all coordinate and come to an agreement.
So, if all the major players in a market independently decide to raise prices at the same time - that's not collusion or price fixing, but if they are observed communicating with each other about it it is?
There is so much availability and exchange of information in today's markets that everyone is effectively communicating with everyone else, regardless of whether or not they ever meet face to face, or exchange e-mails or telephone calls.
Україна досі не є частиною Росії Слава Україні🌻 https://news.stanford.edu/2023/02/17/will-russia-ukraine-war-end