SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
In a stunning example of failure to understand the meaning of the word equality, Github's "social impact team" is now actively discriminating against people based on gender and skin color; white women in particular:
One insider criticized GitHub's "social impact team," which is in charge of figuring out how to use the product to tackle social issues, including diversity within the company itself. It's led by Nicole Sanchez, vice president of social impact, who joined GitHub in May after working as a diversity consultant.
While people inside the company approve of the goal to hire a more diverse workforce, some think the team is contributing to the internal cultural battle.
"They are trying to control culture, interviewing and firing. Scary times at the company without a seasoned leader. While their efforts are admirable it is very hard to even interview people who are 'white' which makes things challenging," this person said.
Sanchez is known for some strong views about diversity. She wrote an article for USA Today shortly before she joined GitHub titled, "More white women does not equal tech diversity."
At one diversity training talk held at a different company and geared toward people of color, she came on a bit stronger with a point that says, "Some of the biggest barriers to progress are white women."
From a site policy standpoint, this really makes me want to argue for finding another host for our rehash repository, enormous pain in the ass though that would be.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by DeathMonkey on Monday February 08 2016, @08:57PM
Except, we're in a sub-thread about GamerGate and a Code of Conduct for a developer forum. That's some powerful crowbarring.
Now if we want to discuss the accusation at hand, let's do it. The sum total of evidence presented that actual illegal hiring practices are occuring is one sentence in a 5 page article with an un-attributed quote from a single person.
(Score: 2) by Post-Nihilist on Monday February 08 2016, @09:11PM
...
...
One insider criticized GitHub's "social impact team," which is in charge of figuring out how to use the product to tackle social issues, including diversity within the company itself. It's led by Nicole Sanchez, vice president of social impact, who joined GitHub in May after working as a diversity consultant.
...
...
From a site policy standpoint, this really makes me want to argue for finding another host for our rehash repository, enormous pain in the ass though that would be.
Is it really a sub thread when it start in the summary ?
Be like us, be different, be a nihilist!!!
(Score: 4, Informative) by DeathMonkey on Monday February 08 2016, @09:20PM
You're proving my point! This is a 5 page article about a whole host of issues. There is a single quote about the diversity issue. The "SJW" user chooses to cherry-pick his pet issue out of that and make the whole story about it!
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Nerdfest on Monday February 08 2016, @10:05PM
The summary posted here is very specifically about *this* issue.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @11:27PM
Actually you have failed to prove you point. The commenter was plainly on topic as the topic is covered in the fucking summary.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @11:50PM
Soylent is Racist!
Apparently this is enough evidence to get a Front Page story about it.
(Score: 4, Informative) by julian on Monday February 08 2016, @09:19PM
That's some powerful crowbarring.
It's not at all. These incestuous cliques are hugely congruent in their ideology, goals, and membership. Github's practices are firmly within the scope of #GamerGate. You can be forgiven for not understanding this if you haven't been very actively involved; there's a lot to take in about a subject that most people frankly don't find very interesting. That's fine too, but then your position needs to be one of admitted and humble ignorance instead of speaking about things you don't sufficiently understand.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Monday February 08 2016, @09:21PM
Read the racist bitch's statements. She hates white people. She hates male whites. No crowbar necessary to include the racist shit from Gamergate into this conversation.
I have nothing but contempt for SJW's, no matter where they are busy turning the world into an open latrine. "Punish whitey, let's get everyoen else in here, but no whites!"
Things may or may not be pushed far enough to spark violence. It wouldn't be that very difficult to do, at this point.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @10:33PM
"If it's white, it just ain't right!" -- Nicole "Cracker Smacker" Sanchez
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2016, @12:45AM
If it weren't for your 4th word, you'd almost come across as reasonable.
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday February 09 2016, @02:12AM
Ask any black person who suffered at the hands of a hateful white mob. Reason doesn't apply with racist bigots.
Are you going to pretend that no woman is a bitch?
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2016, @03:01AM
Are you referring to yourself as a racist bigot?
(Score: 2, Informative) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday February 09 2016, @03:06AM
RTFA - the female dog who is the subject of the article hates white people. She is a racist bigot. Grow up.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 10 2016, @12:18AM
Are you going to pretend that no woman is a bitch?
Slut (n):
1. A woman who will have sex with anyone;
Bitch (n):
1. A woman who will have sex with anyone except you;
Feeling a little neglected, Runaway?
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2016, @04:03AM
With Runaway, it is always about sex, the bitches, the unborn children, and vastly underestimated populations of China. SJWs surround you, Runaway. I suggest you run away, while you still can. Otherwise all us SJWs will have no choice but to violate you. (Wait a minute! Is that what you are trying to provoke? Oh you sly dog, you!)
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday February 09 2016, @03:12PM
Is this really the level of discourse we're aiming for here at Soylent?
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday February 09 2016, @03:45PM
Well, you take the high road, and I'll take whichever road I happen to take. Allow me to make my statement more palatable to your sensitive senses. A racist is undeserving of basic human respect. Thus, the woman who hates white people is equal with any redneck who hates Negros just because they are black. Said people are all on a level with beasts, such as dogs.
Now, may I invite you to climb down off of your high horse, and condemn this subsentient being as she properly deserves?
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday February 09 2016, @05:02PM
Or, perhaps you could make an actual argument instead of just ad-hominem slander. If she's such a racist, why don't you attempt to prove that point. Post some of those smoking-gun quotes you claim exist.
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday February 10 2016, @02:17AM
RTFA, often? She claims that it's difficult to even talk to white people.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Vanderhoth on Monday February 08 2016, @09:29PM
Dude, you just need to let it go. People pretty obviously know now that GamerGate wasn't and isn't the problem. It was a reaction to these shorts of awful people. I'm not saying you have to like it or defend GamerGate, but stop deflecting whenever people point out how awful some people pretending to be for "social justice" are.
I don't even think social justice itself is that bad, but there are some shit people using it to cover for being awful hypocrites. Just don't defend THEM, you're not responsible for them or their actions even if you share some of their ideals.
"Now we know", "And knowing is half the battle". -G.I. Joooooe
(Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @10:19PM
People pretty obviously know now that GamerGate wasn't and isn't the problem. It was a reaction to these shorts of awful people.
Wait, I thought it was about ethics in game journalism! Now its about awful people. So... gamergate was about you? Given how how much venerate it, I guess that's no surprise.
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Vanderhoth on Monday February 08 2016, @10:31PM
Ethics in journalism includes people colluding to push agendas, such as cis-white-males are all misogynists. or supporting some game devs because they're your friends and support your cause while not giving coverage or intentionally negative coverage to people that don't fall into your clique.
I'm not sure what I've said that makes me an awful person. I've even stated I don't have issues with social justice or feminist, I just have an issue with some people that use those ideologies to push their personal bigotries without criticism. I'm just a gamer/tech person that's sick of being told, for over 30 years, I'm the bane of the universe because, through no fault of my own, I was born.
"Now we know", "And knowing is half the battle". -G.I. Joooooe
(Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @10:41PM
> I'm not sure what I've said that makes me an awful person. I've even stated I don't have issues with social justice or feminist,
You know, just because you say something doesn't make it true. Your posts are all unintentional self-revelations. Or really the same revelation over and over again like a little bigotted robot, a little bigbot!
(Score: 2) by Vanderhoth on Monday February 08 2016, @11:12PM
I have no idea what it is you're saying, but I'm happy to listen if you'd like to explain it to me. It'd certainly be more productive than you continuing to follow me around making incoherent snide comments to only make people I'm arguing with look bad. It's kind of unfair to them when people assume some random troll is them with no relevant argument.
"Now we know", "And knowing is half the battle". -G.I. Joooooe
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @11:54PM
> I have no idea what it is you're saying
Correct! You are incapable of self-awareness. That's what makes your tirades so fucking amusing!
> It's kind of unfair to them when people assume some random troll is them with no relevant argument.
It's no less fair than some random troll refusing to acknowledge any relevant counter-arguments. Since you lack self-awareness, I'll spell it out: That's you.
Sometimes when you wrestle with a pig you decide: Fuck it! Let's see just how much fun I can have getting the pig dirty!
(Score: 1, Troll) by aristarchus on Tuesday February 09 2016, @04:06AM
You know, just because you say something doesn't make it true. Your posts are all unintentional self-revelations.
I just want to repeat this, because it is so true. (Nota Bene: Repeating doesn't make it true, but being true makes it worth repeating.)
(Score: 4, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 08 2016, @11:04PM
I don't even think social justice itself is that bad,
You would if you knew more about it's true origins and goals. [youtube.com]
The same can be said of Feminism. [youtube.com]
Suddenly all those people fighting against these manufactured cultural conflicts start making sense. Perhaps they're not racist for disagreeing with the George Soros funded #BlackLivesMatter subversive agenda after all... but I digress.