Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Monday February 08 2016, @07:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the money-talks dept.

In a stunning example of failure to understand the meaning of the word equality, Github's "social impact team" is now actively discriminating against people based on gender and skin color; white women in particular:

One insider criticized GitHub's "social impact team," which is in charge of figuring out how to use the product to tackle social issues, including diversity within the company itself. It's led by Nicole Sanchez, vice president of social impact, who joined GitHub in May after working as a diversity consultant.

While people inside the company approve of the goal to hire a more diverse workforce, some think the team is contributing to the internal cultural battle.

"They are trying to control culture, interviewing and firing. Scary times at the company without a seasoned leader. While their efforts are admirable it is very hard to even interview people who are 'white' which makes things challenging," this person said.

Sanchez is known for some strong views about diversity. She wrote an article for USA Today shortly before she joined GitHub titled, "More white women does not equal tech diversity."

At one diversity training talk held at a different company and geared toward people of color, she came on a bit stronger with a point that says, "Some of the biggest barriers to progress are white women."

From a site policy standpoint, this really makes me want to argue for finding another host for our rehash repository, enormous pain in the ass though that would be.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Tuesday February 09 2016, @05:17AM

    by aristarchus (2645) on Tuesday February 09 2016, @05:17AM (#301196) Journal

    You die, the government taxes it. Death Tax, a tax on dying. Where does this chain of logic break down over in your universe?

    What, pray tell, is the return address on your tax form when you have to file this "death tax"? Next you will be insisting that the Tea(bagger) Party was a real thing and not just a Dick Armey! Oh, jmorris, you are soo funny! Point remains, however, SJW is a meaningless apellation. Political correctness just means being polite in pubic venues. Taxes are the price we pay for civilization. Never let a good man down. And buy low and sell high. Reagan is dead.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by julian on Wednesday February 10 2016, @07:28PM

    by julian (6003) on Wednesday February 10 2016, @07:28PM (#302332)

    Conservatives think that when you die with outstanding tax debt and the Govt takes what you owe from your estate that this is a "death tax".

    As for political correctness, it's not mere politeness; it's enforced politeness with some very nasty consequences for trespassing those fluid rules of etiquette. The rules are also defined by a group who is hostile and bigoted against men, Europeans, Western Enlightenment values, political conservatives, those who oppose Islamism, and many others in a growing list of unpersons.

    I'm not against politeness in general, broadly construed. I am against attacking someone's career, private life, and ability to function in society for violating those rules. If someone is rude to me, I avoid them, and that's all I have any right to do. I don't launch a crusade to excommunicate them from civilization. I see the regressive left doing this all the time now and it's disturbing. There are even times when I myself want to be impolite impolitic for effect. There's a place for it, and we're poorer culturally if we lose that option in the name of comfort.