Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

London Metropolitan Police Consider Drone-Attacking Eagles

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday February 09 2016, @01:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the avian-attack-wing dept.

takyon writes:

Days after Dutch police released a video demonstrating a trained eagle attacking a drone, other police officials and politicians have registered interest:

The Metropolitan Police have confirmed they're looking into deploying drone-busting eagles, a few days after a Scottish MP called for cops north of the border to investigate the possibility of using feathered interceptors to deal with growing flocks of wild UAVs.

According to the Times, Met Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe has tasked a chief inspector with seeing if a Dutch talon-armed anti-UAV initiative might work in the UK's capital.

[...] A Metropolitan Police spokesman said yesterday: "As would be expected in an organisation that is transforming we take an interest in all innovative new ideas and will of course be looking at the work of the Dutch police use of eagles."

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
London Metropolitan Police Consider Drone-Attacking Eagles | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 12 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2016, @02:15AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 09 2016, @02:15AM (#301110)

    Astonishingly, the RSPCA would countenance this plan. Their spokesperson said [bbc.com]:

    In principle we would not have an issue with police forces training eagles in an attempt to tackle drones, although we would have concerns over the welfare of the birds.

    At the moment, however, there is not enough information available for us to be able to make an informed comment.

    National Geographic has come out with an editorial [nationalgeographic.com] against the notion, noting that it's been less than ten years since the bald eagle was removed from the Endangered Species List.