Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Job Automation Continues Apace in the USA and India

posted by takyon on Wednesday February 10 2016, @03:35AM   Printer-friendly
from the efficiency-for-you dept.

Robotron writes:

Portentous changes to the work economies of India and the USA due to job automation by machines and robots continue to make headlines. Varieties of hardware and software automation are seeing implementation burgeon in both countries, as companies seek efficiency by replacing humans with machines. Wage erosion in areas previously unaffected by automation - including varieties of programming - is getting commoner while new, albeit highly specialized, engineering jobs are created. Both articles encourage educational changes mindful of these realities, though how colleges either side of the world can adapt to the blistering pace of automation is unclear.

The latest tranche of job automation news comes hot on the heels of Davos' prediction that machine automation will result in a net loss globally of over 5 million jobs prior to 2020.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Job Automation Continues Apace in the USA and India | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 122 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2) by Joe Desertrat on Friday February 12 2016, @05:57PM

    by Joe Desertrat (2454) on Friday February 12 2016, @05:57PM (#303326)

    Employing poor people. What do you think of employing poor people?

    I'm all for it, as long as they are paid a wage that allows them to better their position. If it is a choice between being poor and unemployed or poor and employed, then they are worse off being employed.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday February 13 2016, @04:53PM

    by khallow (3766) on Saturday February 13 2016, @04:53PM (#303706) Journal

    If it is a choice between being poor and unemployed or poor and employed, then they are worse off being employed.

    Fine since that isn't the choice. It's between unemployed and permanently poor versus employed and less poor with a possibility for bettering oneself, should one choose to do so.