Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Wednesday February 10 2016, @06:43AM   Printer-friendly
from the reloading-our-ammo dept.

A group in Washington is promoting an initiative to reduce gun crime by using laser-etched bullets to track shooters. According to their website, the data will only be used for legitimate investigations (no datamining) and secured with "recursive verification" features (sounds like a blockchain). Washington state already requires ammunition purchasers to produce valid ID when making purchases. Googling reveals that previous efforts by state legislatures to enact similar legislation have been torpedoed by the gun lobby. Initiatives are not subject to lobbying, so it should be interesting to see how the opposition tackles this campaign.

http://dosomethingwa.org
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-guns-ammunition-idUSBRE90J02K20130120
http://igg.me/at/dosomethingwa


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday February 12 2016, @05:26AM

    by c0lo (156) on Friday February 12 2016, @05:26AM (#303094) Journal

    your ID lookup would take maybe 200 milliseconds but the storage transaction would take no time because it's an asynchronous database insertion.

    Asynchronous my ass. The operation involves taking the bullet, scanning it, putting it aside, taking another and repeat. Yeah, I can really see this happening whenever a bullet (together with others) changes hands.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Friday February 12 2016, @05:49AM

    by Gravis (4596) on Friday February 12 2016, @05:49AM (#303101)

    Asynchronous my ass. The operation involves taking the bullet, scanning it, putting it aside, taking another and repeat. Yeah, I can really see this happening whenever a bullet (together with others) changes hands.

    bullets are sold in boxes, so it make a lot more sense to put a barcode identifying the box number on the outside and just push that info to the database. stop making this out to be some sort of monumental effort.

    • (Score: 1, Troll) by c0lo on Friday February 12 2016, @06:02AM

      by c0lo (156) on Friday February 12 2016, @06:02AM (#303104) Journal

      stop making this out to be some sort of monumental effort.

      (yeah, sure, seems wise)

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0