Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Tuesday February 16 2016, @08:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the living-the-dream dept.

Very few carbon-based lifeforms are inhabiting the United Arab Emirates' revolutionary yet unrealized zero-carbon city:

Years from now passing travellers may marvel at the grandeur and the folly of the futuristic landscape on the edges of Abu Dhabi: the barely occupied office block, the deserted streets, the vast tracts of undeveloped land and – most of all – the abandoned dream of a zero-carbon city. Masdar City, when it was first conceived a decade ago, was intended to revolutionise thinking about cities and the built environment.

Now the world's first planned sustainable city – the marquee project of the United Arab Emirates' (UAE) plan to diversify the economy from fossil fuels - could well be the world's first green ghost town. As of this year - when Masdar was originally scheduled for completion - managers have given up on the original goal of building the world's first planned zero-carbon city.

Masdar City is nowhere close to zeroing out its greenhouse gas emissions now, even at a fraction of its planned footprint. And it will not reach that goal even if the development ever gets fully built, the authorities admitted. "We are not going to try to shoehorn renewable energy into the city just to justify a definition created within a boundary," said Chris Wan, the design manager for Masdar City. "As of today, it's not a net zero future," he said. "It's about 50%."

When Masdar City began, in 2006, the project was touted as a model for a green mixed-use urban landscape: a global hub for the cleantech industry, with 50,000 residents and 40,000 commuters. Foster + Partners designed a car-free city scape, with Jetson-style driverless electric cars shuttling passengers between buildings incorporating built-in shades and kitted out with smart technologies to resist the scorching desert heat, and keep cooling costs down. Mubadala, Abu Dhabi's state-owned investment company, pledged financial support to the estimated $22bn experiment in urban design.

Ten years on, however, only a fraction of the town has been built - less than 5% of the original six square km "greenprint", as Wan called it. The completion date has been pushed back to 2030. [...] The pioneering autonomous transport system - which was originally supposed to stretch to 100 stations - was scrapped after the first two stops. There is a bike-sharing station – though it's a good 10 miles away from Abu Dhabi, and there are no bike paths. [...] [Chris Wan] maintained it was important to look at Masdar City within the context of the other renewable energy holdings of the parent company. Among Mubadala's other holdings, Masdar Clean Energy is developing the Shams solar farm.

Some more background on Masdar City (مدينة مصدر).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Tuesday February 16 2016, @10:55PM

    by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday February 16 2016, @10:55PM (#305480)

    oil still flowing from the ground at lower cost than water

    Desal water is getting cheap. Like $4 per 1000 gallons. Maybe cheaper if the accountants are crooked enough. UAE gets all their drinking water from desal. I clicked around on wikipedia and was surprised to discover this city project is getting four solar powered desal plants. Thats about right if they ever get the 50K residents they're claiming... or if it stays at the 4K residents they actually have in the ghost town, its hard to economically run plants below 10% capacity, so they kinda have a little problem.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday February 17 2016, @03:21AM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday February 17 2016, @03:21AM (#305582)

    $4 per 1000 gallons is pretty impressive, now, if that's burning Saudi oil at $4 a barrel production cost, maybe not as impressive, but still good to get 1000 gallons out of a single barrel of crude.

    --
    🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]
    • (Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday February 17 2016, @12:49PM

      by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday February 17 2016, @12:49PM (#305728)

      The San Diego desal plant is charging $6 for the same amount of water, and they have impressive california cost of land, regulation, labor, insane california electric prices, and are baking a 12% profit into the cake. So $4 in the third world is realistic.