Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Tuesday February 16 2016, @08:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the living-the-dream dept.

Very few carbon-based lifeforms are inhabiting the United Arab Emirates' revolutionary yet unrealized zero-carbon city:

Years from now passing travellers may marvel at the grandeur and the folly of the futuristic landscape on the edges of Abu Dhabi: the barely occupied office block, the deserted streets, the vast tracts of undeveloped land and – most of all – the abandoned dream of a zero-carbon city. Masdar City, when it was first conceived a decade ago, was intended to revolutionise thinking about cities and the built environment.

Now the world's first planned sustainable city – the marquee project of the United Arab Emirates' (UAE) plan to diversify the economy from fossil fuels - could well be the world's first green ghost town. As of this year - when Masdar was originally scheduled for completion - managers have given up on the original goal of building the world's first planned zero-carbon city.

Masdar City is nowhere close to zeroing out its greenhouse gas emissions now, even at a fraction of its planned footprint. And it will not reach that goal even if the development ever gets fully built, the authorities admitted. "We are not going to try to shoehorn renewable energy into the city just to justify a definition created within a boundary," said Chris Wan, the design manager for Masdar City. "As of today, it's not a net zero future," he said. "It's about 50%."

When Masdar City began, in 2006, the project was touted as a model for a green mixed-use urban landscape: a global hub for the cleantech industry, with 50,000 residents and 40,000 commuters. Foster + Partners designed a car-free city scape, with Jetson-style driverless electric cars shuttling passengers between buildings incorporating built-in shades and kitted out with smart technologies to resist the scorching desert heat, and keep cooling costs down. Mubadala, Abu Dhabi's state-owned investment company, pledged financial support to the estimated $22bn experiment in urban design.

Ten years on, however, only a fraction of the town has been built - less than 5% of the original six square km "greenprint", as Wan called it. The completion date has been pushed back to 2030. [...] The pioneering autonomous transport system - which was originally supposed to stretch to 100 stations - was scrapped after the first two stops. There is a bike-sharing station – though it's a good 10 miles away from Abu Dhabi, and there are no bike paths. [...] [Chris Wan] maintained it was important to look at Masdar City within the context of the other renewable energy holdings of the parent company. Among Mubadala's other holdings, Masdar Clean Energy is developing the Shams solar farm.

Some more background on Masdar City (مدينة مصدر).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Saturday February 20 2016, @09:32PM

    by Gravis (4596) on Saturday February 20 2016, @09:32PM (#307520)

    I didn't say the car was less green, i said the "transportation system" was less green.

    touche.

    If making "locally green" choices doesn't net benefit the environment then I'm not really accomplishing anything. We need solutions that result in net benefits, not local ones.

    Sure it does. It's baby steps toward a real solution. Just like a single gene mutation may have little to no effect but when the last gene of the puzzle is in place it will cause an evolutionary leap. [wikipedia.org] One person can only change what they do, not what other people do (without governmental interference) but when we all work together it will have a huge impact. voting systems have the same issue where one vote for a candidate doesn't matter but if enough people vote together, that candidate will win. my vote is for electromagnetic energy processes instead of chemical energy processes and when enough people vote the same way, we elect (see what i did there) to save the planet. :)

    An electric car might be part of a net green solution or it might not be, depending on what's happening in the rest of the system it is part of.

    it is part of a realistic sustainable solution which seems like the definition of "green". if you are consumed by what other parts of the system are doing, you will be paralyzed into inaction. all we can do is fix the parts of the system that we can and trust that the other parts of the system will eventually be fixed by other people fixing the part of the system that they can fix. trying to fix the entire system by yourself is an unrealistic task.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2