SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Judge Orders Apple to Unlock iPhone Belonging to San Bernardino Shooter
Apple has been ordered to assist in the unlocking of an iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters. This may require updating the firmware to bypass restrictions on PIN unlock attempts:
Apple must assist the FBI in unlocking the passcode-protected encrypted iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters in California. US magistrate Sheri Pym says Cupertino must supply software that prevents the phone from automatically annihilating its user data when too many password attempts have been made.
The smartphone belonged to Syed Farook, who with his wife Tashfeen Malik shot and killed 14 coworkers on December 2. The couple died in a gun battle with police soon after. Cops have been unable to access Syed's iPhone 5C because they do not know the correct PIN, and will now gain the assistance of Apple, as ordered by Judge Pym [PDF] on Tuesday.
iOS 8 and above encrypts data on devices, requiring a four to six-digit PIN to unlock. After the first few wrong guesses, iOS waits a few minutes between accepting further PIN entry attempts, escalating to an hour's delay after the ninth failed login.
[...] Judge Pym wants Apple to come up with some magic software – perhaps a signed firmware update or something else loaded during boot-up – that will allow the FBI to safely brute-force the PIN entry without the device self-destructing. This code must only work on Farook's phone, identified by its serial numbers, and no other handset. The code must only be run on government or Apple property, and must not slow down the brute-forcing process.
Apple has five days to appeal or demonstrate that it cannot comply with the order. It is crucial to note that the central district court of California has not instructed Apple to crack its encryption – instead it wants Apple to provide a tool to effectively bypass the unlocking mechanism. "It's technically possible for Apple to hack a device's PIN, wipe, and other functions. Question is can they be legally forced to hack," said iOS security expert Jonathan Ździarski.
Apple Ordered to Aid FBI in Unlocking Shooter's iPhone
According to this Reuters article, "A U.S. judge on Tuesday ordered Apple Inc to help the FBI break into a phone recovered from one of the San Bernardino shooters, an order that heightens a long-running dispute between tech companies and law enforcement over the limits of encryption.
Apple must provide "reasonable technical assistance" to investigators seeking to unlock the data on an iPhone 5C that had been owned by Syed Rizwan Farook, Judge Sheri Pym of U.S. District Court in Los Angeles said in a ruling."
"...Forensics expert Jonathan Zdziarski said Tuesday Apple might have to write custom code to comply with the order, presenting a novel question to the court about whether the government could order a private company to hack its own device.
Zdziarski said that because the San Bernardino shooting was being investigated as a terrorism case, investigators would be able to work with the NSA and CIA on cracking the phone. Those U.S. intelligence agencies likely could break the iPhone's encryption without Apple's involvement, he said."
Update: EFF to file an amicus brief in support of Apple's position.
Update 2: mendax writes: The New York Times has some "breaking news" which says that Apple will not comply with the judge's order. It's a good way to get in trouble with the judge but it's the right decision on Apple's part.
Previously: FBI Unable to Decrypt California Terrorists' Cell Phone
(Score: 1, Flamebait) by SpockLogic on Wednesday February 17 2016, @02:15PM
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
The right wing authoritarian low information voters are beying like a pack of hounds for Apple to capitulate. They are too dumb to realize or care about the consequences of their actions. I hope Apple resists.
Overreacting is one thing, sticking your head up your ass hoping the problem goes away is another - edIII
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Wednesday February 17 2016, @02:32PM
It's not just "right wing" authoritarians, but authoritarians on all sides.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday February 18 2016, @12:06AM
Folks using just that 1-dimensional description of the possibilities are going to have a limited view of the world and will conflate things.
...and Democrats (whom many mistakenly call "Left") are NOT anti-Capitalism, putting them on the (economic) Right according to PoliticalCompass' 2-dimensional grid. [politicalcompass.org]
Note also that, as you allude to, Democrats--with rare exception--are also on the anti-civil liberties side of that divide (and are in favor of a police state).
There is 1 outlier shown on their graph for the current race. [politicalcompass.org]
(Green Party candidates aren't shown yet.)
I have also looked at their interactive chart for senators and the most "Progressive" states I could find (Rhode Island and Minnesota) were still in the upper right quadrant.
-- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday February 17 2016, @03:22PM
Ditto what Anal PUmpernickel said. If you doubt that there are left wing authoritarians, then you've just not been paying attention. Who is it that wants to pass a new law, every time a new crime is dreamed up, every time someone beats a jury, every time another "minority" is "offended". Authoritarians from the left want to control your every word, every action, every thought.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 1) by purple_cobra on Wednesday February 17 2016, @06:34PM
I agree that there's little point blaming along partisan lines; if some entity wishes to control you, you should be immediately distrustful, whether it's by creating laws to "prevent" you being a dick or creating laws preventing you from using your dick (or other genitalia you have present; see the whole de-funding of Planned Parenthood (IIRC) saga, etc).
The whole partisan pissing contest is whipped-up by tabloid press/TV, solely to stop people engaging their eyes, ears and brains to identify who they're more alike: their neighbour who maybe votes a different way or the puffed-up bombast yelling on the screen in front of them, made rich by keeping you poor.
(Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 17 2016, @08:42PM
Authoritarians want to control your every word, every action, every thought.
There. FTFY. cf. here [wikipedia.org], here [wikipedia.org], . here [cnn.com], here [wikipedia.org] and here [time.com]
See what I mean? Those authoritarians are everywhere!
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday February 17 2016, @11:04PM