Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday February 28 2016, @03:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the why-do-we-let-him-get-away-wiht-this-behavior dept.

Alexander Burns and Maggie Haberman write in The New York Times that, with his enormous online platform of six million followers, Donald Trump has used Twitter to badger and humiliate those who have dared cross him during the presidential race, latching on to their vulnerabilities, mocking their physical characteristics, personality quirks and, sometimes, their professional setbacks. Trump has made statements that have later been exposed as false or deceptive — only after they have ricocheted across the Internet.

For example, Cheri Jacobus, a Republican political strategist, did not think she had done anything out of the ordinary: On a cable television show, she criticized Donald J. Trump for skipping a debate in Iowa in late January and described him as a "bad debater." Trump took to Twitter, repeatedly branding Jacobus as a disappointed job seeker who had begged to work for his campaign and had been rejected. "We said no and she went hostile," Trump wrote. "A real dummy!" Trump's campaign manager told the same story on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." For days, Trump's followers replied to his posts with demeaning, often sexually charged insults aimed at Jacobus, including several with altered, vulgar photographs of her face.

It is not just that Trump has a skill for zeroing in on an individual's soft spot and hammering at it. It is that he sets a tone of aggression against the person, and his supporters echo and amplify it. Jacobus sent a cease-and-desist letter to Trump and his top aide, citing electronic messages that showed the Trump campaign had courted her and not the other way around. "I have been trashed and ruined on Twitter," Jacobus says adding that Trump's lawyers had responded to her letter, but that they had not yet reached a resolution.

This week, Trump sent out a menacing message on Twitter about the Ricketts family, a wealthy clan of Republican political donors, after it was reported that Marlene Ricketts donated $3 million to a group opposed to Trump's candidacy. "They better be careful," Trump wrote of the family, "they have a lot to hide!" "It's a little surreal when Donald Trump threatens your mom," Marlene Ricketts's son, Tom, later told reporters.

"At what point does it cross the line into something that's defamatory and might be actionable?" says Parry Aftab, a lawyer who leads the Internet safety group WiredSafety. "At what point does it cross the line into encouraging violence against groups and individuals?"


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Touché) by maxwell demon on Sunday February 28 2016, @05:06PM

    by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 28 2016, @05:06PM (#311177) Journal

    He's forth it, just for pissing off the corporate oligarchy and their media. The more hit pieces they print, the stronger he gets. What you "lefties" don't understand is that most people are sick and tired of endless bailouts, cronyism, wars and globalism. Their lives just aren't getting any better.

    If that's the only consideration when choosing for whom to vote, then one day they'll wish their lives would just not be getting any better.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Funny=1, Touché=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday February 28 2016, @06:19PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 28 2016, @06:19PM (#311201) Journal

    If that's the only consideration when choosing for whom to vote, then one day they'll wish their lives would just not be getting any better.

    Who should they be voting for again?

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by maxwell demon on Sunday February 28 2016, @06:42PM

      by maxwell demon (1608) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 28 2016, @06:42PM (#311209) Journal

      That depends on their political position. But there's no political position for which Trump is the correct choice. Well, unless your political position is that America deserves to suffer. ;-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
      • (Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday February 28 2016, @10:21PM

        by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 28 2016, @10:21PM (#311307) Journal

        But there's no political position for which Trump is the correct choice.

        Well, looks like millions of people disagree.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 29 2016, @12:04AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 29 2016, @12:04AM (#311350)

          But there's no political position for which Trump is the correct choice.

          Well, looks like millions of people disagree.

          Millions of people are idiots. Your point?

          • (Score: 1) by khallow on Monday February 29 2016, @12:09AM

            by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Monday February 29 2016, @12:09AM (#311351) Journal
            My point is that millions of idiots can evaluate their political interests better than one idiot can.
            • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday February 29 2016, @12:14AM

              by c0lo (156) on Monday February 29 2016, @12:14AM (#311357) Journal

              My point is that millions of idiots can evaluate their political interests better than one idiot can.

              Yeap. The same people that took "House prices never go down" hook line and sinker.

              --
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
      • (Score: 4, Insightful) by deimtee on Monday February 29 2016, @12:12AM

        by deimtee (3272) on Monday February 29 2016, @12:12AM (#311355) Journal

        But there's no political position for which Trump is the correct choice.

        The menu today is:

        - Horseshit on Toast
        - Excrement in a Bun
        - Cowshit on Toast
        - Pigshit on Rye Toast
        - Feces in a Wrap

        Or you can say fuck them all, kick over the table, and walk away.
        Sometimes a Pyrrhic Victory is the best you can do.

        I am not a USian, so I don't get to vote anyway, but from outside looking in, Trump doesn't seem worse than the other candidates.
        They are either cynically corrupt sociopaths or batshit insane religious nuts. Or both.

        --
        No problem is insoluble, but at Ksp = 2.943×10−25 Mercury Sulphide comes close.
  • (Score: 2) by hemocyanin on Sunday February 28 2016, @10:38PM

    by hemocyanin (186) on Sunday February 28 2016, @10:38PM (#311315) Journal

    then one day they'll wish their lives would just not be getting any better.

    I don't comprehend. Of all the things that hit working people the hardest, "endless bailouts, cronyism, wars and globalism" make up a substantial portion.