SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the why-do-we-let-him-get-away-wiht-this-behavior dept.
Alexander Burns and Maggie Haberman write in The New York Times that, with his enormous online platform of six million followers, Donald Trump has used Twitter to badger and humiliate those who have dared cross him during the presidential race, latching on to their vulnerabilities, mocking their physical characteristics, personality quirks and, sometimes, their professional setbacks. Trump has made statements that have later been exposed as false or deceptive — only after they have ricocheted across the Internet.
For example, Cheri Jacobus, a Republican political strategist, did not think she had done anything out of the ordinary: On a cable television show, she criticized Donald J. Trump for skipping a debate in Iowa in late January and described him as a "bad debater." Trump took to Twitter, repeatedly branding Jacobus as a disappointed job seeker who had begged to work for his campaign and had been rejected. "We said no and she went hostile," Trump wrote. "A real dummy!" Trump's campaign manager told the same story on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." For days, Trump's followers replied to his posts with demeaning, often sexually charged insults aimed at Jacobus, including several with altered, vulgar photographs of her face.
It is not just that Trump has a skill for zeroing in on an individual's soft spot and hammering at it. It is that he sets a tone of aggression against the person, and his supporters echo and amplify it. Jacobus sent a cease-and-desist letter to Trump and his top aide, citing electronic messages that showed the Trump campaign had courted her and not the other way around. "I have been trashed and ruined on Twitter," Jacobus says adding that Trump's lawyers had responded to her letter, but that they had not yet reached a resolution.
This week, Trump sent out a menacing message on Twitter about the Ricketts family, a wealthy clan of Republican political donors, after it was reported that Marlene Ricketts donated $3 million to a group opposed to Trump's candidacy. "They better be careful," Trump wrote of the family, "they have a lot to hide!" "It's a little surreal when Donald Trump threatens your mom," Marlene Ricketts's son, Tom, later told reporters.
"At what point does it cross the line into something that's defamatory and might be actionable?" says Parry Aftab, a lawyer who leads the Internet safety group WiredSafety. "At what point does it cross the line into encouraging violence against groups and individuals?"
(Score: 3, Funny) by maxwell demon on Sunday February 28 2016, @06:42PM
That depends on their political position. But there's no political position for which Trump is the correct choice. Well, unless your political position is that America deserves to suffer. ;-)
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday February 28 2016, @10:21PM
But there's no political position for which Trump is the correct choice.
Well, looks like millions of people disagree.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday February 29 2016, @12:04AM
Millions of people are idiots. Your point?
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday February 29 2016, @12:09AM
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Monday February 29 2016, @12:14AM
Yeap. The same people that took "House prices never go down" hook line and sinker.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
(Score: 4, Insightful) by deimtee on Monday February 29 2016, @12:12AM
The menu today is:
- Horseshit on Toast
- Excrement in a Bun
- Cowshit on Toast
- Pigshit on Rye Toast
- Feces in a Wrap
Or you can say fuck them all, kick over the table, and walk away.
Sometimes a Pyrrhic Victory is the best you can do.
I am not a USian, so I don't get to vote anyway, but from outside looking in, Trump doesn't seem worse than the other candidates.
They are either cynically corrupt sociopaths or batshit insane religious nuts. Or both.
No problem is insoluble, but at Ksp = 2.943×10−25 Mercury Sulphide comes close.