Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Informative) by lhsi on Sunday April 13 2014, @04:46PM

    by lhsi (711) on Sunday April 13 2014, @04:46PM (#30788) Journal

    I got the email but can't think of any suggestions so haven't responded

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Informative=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by isostatic on Sunday April 13 2014, @05:42PM

    by isostatic (365) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 13 2014, @05:42PM (#30806) Journal

    Quite. Soylentnews is on the list, I will be voting for that, so no need to respond to this.

    Although uyvouo6rc7rctf.com could be interesting. I hope the suggestions are sanitised. Democracy is good, but death by committee isn't

    • (Score: 5, Interesting) by RobotMonster on Sunday April 13 2014, @05:52PM

      by RobotMonster (130) on Sunday April 13 2014, @05:52PM (#30810) Journal

      I'll probably be voting for SoylentNews, but it entirely depends on what the choices are -- there might be something really clever.
      I've been trying to think of something clever, but have failed thus far...
      Would have been neat if the submissions included suggestions for the extra terms involved; i.e. the equivalencies for "Soyled", "Soylentors", etc

      • (Score: 1) by yellowantphil on Sunday April 13 2014, @06:17PM

        by yellowantphil (2125) on Sunday April 13 2014, @06:17PM (#30821) Homepage

        Would have been neat if the submissions included suggestions for the extra terms involved; i.e. the equivalencies for "Soyled", "Soylentors", etc

        What about "Soylenators"? It seems more dignified than "soylentils," although I don't object to that name.

        • (Score: 2) by RobotMonster on Sunday April 13 2014, @06:55PM

          by RobotMonster (130) on Sunday April 13 2014, @06:55PM (#30834) Journal

          What about "Soylenators"?

          Love it! I was close with "Soylentors", but that extra 'a' makes all the difference.

          If SoylentNews survives the name-change-vote, this should be made the official term.
          If somebody could loan us a time-travel-device, I'm sure we could get Charlton Heston to issue a royal decree.

          • (Score: 1) by yellowantphil on Sunday April 13 2014, @07:05PM

            by yellowantphil (2125) on Sunday April 13 2014, @07:05PM (#30841) Homepage

            I actually misread your earlier post at first, which is where I got "soylenators" from. Although I do like "soylentors" a bit better than "soylentils."

          • (Score: 2) by egcagrac0 on Monday April 14 2014, @03:48PM

            by egcagrac0 (2705) on Monday April 14 2014, @03:48PM (#31351)

            Maybe after we decide on a site name, we should hold a vote to decide the common term for the community members.

            • (Score: 2) by RobotMonster on Monday April 14 2014, @04:32PM

              by RobotMonster (130) on Monday April 14 2014, @04:32PM (#31367) Journal

              Good idea, though it does suggest the term "voters" :-)
              Seriously though leaving it to 'organically evolve' is probably better.

              • (Score: 2) by egcagrac0 on Monday April 14 2014, @06:48PM

                by egcagrac0 (2705) on Monday April 14 2014, @06:48PM (#31469)

                Well, in another week or so, "lentils" makes less sense (for some).

        • (Score: 1) by Bill, Shooter Of Bul on Monday April 21 2014, @02:02PM

          by Bill, Shooter Of Bul (3170) on Monday April 21 2014, @02:02PM (#33956)

          It should be soynuts.

        • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday April 23 2014, @04:51PM

          by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday April 23 2014, @04:51PM (#34995)

          Soyluser [catb.org] is my wish.

          --
          "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
      • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Monday April 14 2014, @07:03PM

        by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Monday April 14 2014, @07:03PM (#31484) Homepage Journal

        Same here, waiting on the vote itself.

        --
        No one born who could always afford anything he wanted can have a clue what "affordability" means.
      • (Score: 2) by Hairyfeet on Friday April 18 2014, @12:23AM

        by Hairyfeet (75) <{bassbeast1968} {at} {gmail.com}> on Friday April 18 2014, @12:23AM (#32907) Journal

        I say if it ain't broke don't fix it. Soylent is clever, short, and an inside joke for the geeks, all in all I think its a top notch name.

        --
        ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
    • (Score: 1) by yellowantphil on Sunday April 13 2014, @06:11PM

      by yellowantphil (2125) on Sunday April 13 2014, @06:11PM (#30819) Homepage

      Although uyvouo6rc7rctf.com could be interesting. I hope the suggestions are sanitised. Democracy is good, but death by committee isn't

      Yes, they will have to remove some of the submissions, depending on what they get. There's no point in voting to change the site name to microsoft.com, 5lashd0t.org, or FreeSoyletOnlineGambling.org. I would be a bit curious to see the list of unusable suggestions though.

    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Wednesday April 23 2014, @04:56PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Wednesday April 23 2014, @04:56PM (#34997)

      Er...what is "uyvouo6rc7rctf" supposed to mean? It's not ROT13 and I can't parse it as leet-speak...and googling it only turns up your comment. Fourteen chars is too long a faceroll to remember.

      *scratches head*

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
      • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Wednesday April 23 2014, @06:04PM

        by isostatic (365) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 23 2014, @06:04PM (#35044) Journal

        It's the sister of opans0yf34aqflsdf.com and as08ndyf93aq4fawdf.com

      • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Saturday April 26 2014, @07:32PM

        by isostatic (365) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 26 2014, @07:32PM (#36689) Journal

        It's amazing, and scary, how google finds one string of characters someone in it's massive cache of the internet, and returns the result in milliseconds

        • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday April 28 2014, @02:29PM

          by tangomargarine (667) on Monday April 28 2014, @02:29PM (#37177)

          If you had bothered to read my comment, jackass, you'd see that I already tried that. Tried it again just now, with Safesearch off, and unhiding the duplicate results. I currently get 3 copies of the same original Slashdot comment that I replied to.

          --
          "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
          • (Score: 2) by isostatic on Monday April 28 2014, @08:30PM

            by isostatic (365) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 28 2014, @08:30PM (#37380) Journal

            You have no concept of cats do you?

            The tangical thought that google not only indexes every single word on the internet, but has access to it in milliseconds, is scary way beyond your inability to engage in polite conversation.

            • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday April 28 2014, @09:06PM

              by tangomargarine (667) on Monday April 28 2014, @09:06PM (#37392)

              Cats? I'm not sure what you're trying to say. If you can demonstrate a Google search that actually shows me what you claim it does, please do.

              The same Google also doesn't have a definition for the word "tangicle" either. Is this whole conversation some Absurdist metaphor? Or have I been misinterpreting your followup remarks as sarcasm when they're just off-the-cuff musings and bad spelling?

              --
              "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
      • (Score: 1) by timbim on Sunday April 27 2014, @04:59PM

        by timbim (907) on Sunday April 27 2014, @04:59PM (#36903)

        Ever use tor?

        • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday April 28 2014, @02:31PM

          by tangomargarine (667) on Monday April 28 2014, @02:31PM (#37178)

          No...is that supposed to be an exit node ID or something?

          --
          "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
  • (Score: 1) by pert.boioioing on Monday April 14 2014, @01:43PM

    by pert.boioioing (1117) on Monday April 14 2014, @01:43PM (#31275)

    Since the the .org .net and .com TLD's need to be available that excludes my primary choice, "www.clownpenis.fart" [www.dula.tv]

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 14 2014, @03:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 14 2014, @03:48PM (#31352)

    exactly, I want to vote, not suggest anything. Although anything would be better than "soylentnews"