Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday March 18 2016, @06:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the like-AOL-in-the-good-old-days dept.

There's a a growing trend to close off publishing platforms by demanding a login in order to view the content. Which is a move away from an open web. In December 2015 Facebook launched its own in-app browser, which is basically a web-view that loads links you tap on using the Facebook app. It may provide convenience for some but the primary goal is to keep users inside the application longer. This opens up more advertising exposure and associated revenue. This poses a challenge to the open web because this overrides the user's default mobile browser keeps the eyeballs in a closed ecosystem. The feature Instant Articles for publishers is done such that it loads articles available nearly instantly in the app compared to a mobile browser. This opens up for monetizing viewing and privacy invasions by Facebook on users. The in-app browser lack decent privacy controls.

Facebook is trying to accomplish a closed version of the internet. The Free Basics initiative with Facebook as the gatekeeper offers users free access to select websites. This initiative made privacy advocates in India, who play an instrumental role in the makeup of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) to vote on 2016-02-08 that all data pricing must be equal, and that companies cannot offer cheaper rates than others for certain content. The decision favours net neutrality and essentially bans Facebook's initiative in that country. The Indian TRAI ruling states that pricing must be content agnostic. Facebook has become a monolithic platform that tries to mimic existing services by offering video uploads (YouTube), money transfers (PayPal) etc. Facebook is expanding like a invasive species similar to the Borg from Star Trek trying to absorb everything that touches their sphere of interest.

In the future, could resistance be futile because you will miss out essential information?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by Nuke on Friday March 18 2016, @10:01AM

    by Nuke (3162) on Friday March 18 2016, @10:01AM (#319923)

    Facebook Moves in to Make the Web a Facebook Monopoly

    Isn't this a bit on the sensationalist side?

    Whether Facebook monopolise it or not, I think a more important point is that they are doing it at all and that their rivals will do the same, until it is not possible to surf a large part of the web except though some advertising giant's portal.

    I am already finding sites such as general discussion sites and even specific company advertising sites (like I was looking to buy some car accessories) which would not even let you browse the site unless you came in via an account with Google Plus, Disqus or Facebook. If I were a business with a website advertising my stuff, I'd want as few obstacles as possible to people seeing it, so what are these companies thinking of? Has their web developer taken them for a ride, with bungs from Facebook and Disqus ?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=1, Underrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 18 2016, @11:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 18 2016, @11:12AM (#319933)

    well, it is a good way of keeping out trolls. maybe they weighed the options, and decided that potential buyers motivated enough to create an account are enough to make them profitable (rather than expose themselves to all buyers + trolls).