Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday April 01 2016, @01:02AM   Printer-friendly
from the making-hot-cool dept.

Ideally, the electronic components that route electricity through power supplies, inverters, and electric motors are cheap, efficient, and capable of handling high voltages. Judged in these terms, gallium oxide could be the best material yet, according to recent work by ­Flosfia, a startup in Kyoto.

That's because silicon—the incumbent material for making diodes and transistors for the power electronics market—is cheap but not very efficient. And although this weakness is addressed by devices made from silicon carbide and gallium nitride, both have had limited commercial success due to high prices. Flosfia's diodes are already performing more efficiently than those made from SiC and GaN.

The superiority of these gallium oxide devices stems from the material's approximately 5–electron-volt bandgap—way higher than that of gallium nitride (about 3.4 eV) or silicon carbide (about 3.3 eV). Bandgap is a measure of the energy required to kick an electron into a conducting state. A bigger bandgap enables a material to withstand a stronger electric field, making it possible to use a thinner device for a given voltage. That's a big deal because the thinner the device, the lower its resistance, and thus the more efficient it is.

Gallium oxide devices do not excel in all areas. Their Achilles' heel is poor thermal conductivity. "When you make a high-power device, you need to have a good thermal conductivity to extract the heat out of the device," explains Hong Lin, senior market and technology analyst at Yole Développement in Lyon, France.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Friday April 01 2016, @02:21AM

    by captain normal (2205) on Friday April 01 2016, @02:21AM (#325586)

    Even if it is April Fool's day, I'll bite. Electrical conductivity is dependent on surface area, not on thickness. Also if the material is a poor thermal conductor and holds heat instead of conducting it away, there's a problem as when a conductor heats up it's resistance raises.

    --
    "It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they have been fooled" Mark Twain
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2016, @07:26AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 01 2016, @07:26AM (#325628)

    conductivity is dependent on surface area, not on thickness

    Well, at ridiculously high frequencies, there's the "skin effect" where the shape of the conductor can become the major determinant of the impedance.

    Until you get to frequencies where that stuff is significant in the vector, resistance dominates and that is inversely proportional to the cross sectional area of the conductor.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]