Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Tuesday April 12 2016, @11:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the need-to-fix-their-little-red-wagon dept.

Now this is scary. CNBC has a story posted: Execs: We're not responsible for cybersecurity. The story was posted on April 1, but I do not think this is a joke.

More than 90 percent of corporate executives said they cannot read a cybersecurity report and are not prepared to handle a major attack, according to a new survey.

More distressing is that 40 percent of executives said they don't feel responsible for the repercussions of hackings, said Dave Damato, chief security officer at Tanium, which commissioned the survey with the Nasdaq.

"I think the most shocking statistic was really the fact that the individuals at the top of an organization — executives like CEOs and CIOs, and even board members — didn't feel personally responsible for cybersecurity or protecting the customer data," Damato told CNBC's "Squawk Box". ...

"As a result they're handing this off to their techies, and they're really just placing their heads in the sand right now," he said.

I suppose I should not be surprised, but I find it absolutely appalling that there could be this level of active ignorance at such a high level in an organization. What would it take to make said "leaders" actually care about security?

Current practices of providing a year or two of credit monitoring seems woefully inadequate compensation. What if the affected company had to make an actual cash payout of, say, $500 to every person who had their personally identifiable information (PII) compromised? Treble that amount if the notification is not "timely"?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by dltaylor on Wednesday April 13 2016, @12:44AM

    by dltaylor (4693) on Wednesday April 13 2016, @12:44AM (#330921)

    If it doesn't hurt them, they have no reason to care. Even payouts are going to be covered by insurance, or some such, as a "cost of doing business". 5 years for the CxO, 3 for the president, 2 for the VPs and 1 for the directors. All as felonies serious enough to make them unemployable as senior business management. Then, they will care to put enough into the budgets to hire the right people, and give them the authority to make the needed changes.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4