Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by mattie_p on Tuesday February 18 2014, @07:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the and-now-for-sports dept.

CoolHand writes:

"Sci-Tech Today talks about the role of technology in the Olympics from a unique perspective:

Every advance in the ever-accelerating juggernaut of sports technology threatens to widen the divide between Olympic haves and have-nots. Well-sponsored teams and rich governments pay top-end scientists and engineers to shape their skis, perfect their skates, tighten their suits, measure their gravitational pull.

I'm no luddite, but this seems to make these sports more about who can afford the best tech, and less about the true spirit of the games: bringing the best athletes from all countries together to compete. How can it be about the athletes, when some of the best athletes may never win due to lack of funding/tech?"

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by bungle on Tuesday February 18 2014, @07:48PM

    by bungle (1370) on Tuesday February 18 2014, @07:48PM (#1843)

    Or make everyone use the same equipment...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by Vanderhoth on Tuesday February 18 2014, @08:07PM

    by Vanderhoth (61) on Tuesday February 18 2014, @08:07PM (#1868)

    Here's your jockstrap, I'll need it back for the 1:30 game.

    Sorry I know what you meant, but couldn't resist a little fun.

    "Now we know", "And knowing is half the battle". -G.I. Joooooe
  • (Score: 1) by buswolley on Tuesday February 18 2014, @08:17PM

    by buswolley (848) on Tuesday February 18 2014, @08:17PM (#1875)

    ... except I'd randomize to two conditions (with tech, without tech). Then we could measure the impact of science.

    subicular junctures