Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by CoolHand on Friday April 15 2016, @12:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the retarded-big-brother dept.

El Reg :

Analysis In the wake of the FBI's failed fight against Apple, Senators Richard Burr (R-NC) and Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) have introduced a draft bill that would effectively ban strong crypto.

The bill would require tech and communications companies to allow law enforcement with a court order to decrypt their customers' data. Last week a draft copy of the bill, dubbed the Compliance with Court Orders Act of 2016, was leaked, but the new version is even worse than the discussion draft.

In the draft version, court orders could only be issued for a crime resulting in death or serious bodily harm, terrorism and espionage, crimes against minors, serious violent felonies or Federal drug crimes. In the final version, those caveats are gone, so any court order will allow the police to access the data they want.

The bill would apply to "device manufacturers, software manufacturers, electronic communication services, remote communication services, providers of wire or electronic communication services, providers of remote communication services, or any person who provides a product or method to facilitate a communication or to process or store data." That's a pretty wide net.

"No entity or individual is above the law," said Feinstein. "The bill we have drafted would simply provide that, if a court of law issues an order to render technical assistance or provide decrypted data, the company or individual would be required to do so.

"Today, terrorists and criminals are increasingly using encryption to foil law enforcement efforts, even in the face of a court order. We need strong encryption to protect personal data, but we also need to know when terrorists are plotting to kill Americans."

Idiots, I tell you, they're a pair of idiots.


Original Submission #1
Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Common Joe on Friday April 15 2016, @05:21AM

    by Common Joe (33) <reversethis-{moc ... 1010.eoj.nommoc}> on Friday April 15 2016, @05:21AM (#332076) Journal

    You should thank her instead for the entertainment value. Tell her you'd never break the law, but you'll be watching with popcorn as hackers infiltrate her bank accounts, email accounts, etc and steal her identity. Be sure to mention the Streisand Effect.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday April 15 2016, @11:53AM

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday April 15 2016, @11:53AM (#332179) Journal

    Jesus, if only they would. It has been over a decade now that they've been waging war on us. Time for the same to redound on them a million-fold.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
  • (Score: 2) by captain normal on Friday April 15 2016, @04:23PM

    by captain normal (2205) on Friday April 15 2016, @04:23PM (#332275)

    I would love to see her and her husband's backdoor dealings brought to light.

    --
    The Musk/Trump interview appears to have been hacked, but not a DDOS hack...more like A Distributed Denial of Reality.