Sneaky user interfaces, such as unwanted bundleware default checkboxes are now expanding into digital newspaper subscriptions. The Boston Globe's site uses lightly-colored close buttons and increases the price as the user goes through the sales process, as well as includes some newsletter-signup defaults. These dishonest-by-design interface elements that are intended to trick or obfuscate users are called dark patterns.
What are some of the most egregious examples you have seen? Have you even been asked to implement a design you found morally distasteful?
(Score: 2, Interesting) by khallow on Wednesday April 27 2016, @03:37AM
but rather the combat
How about this [popehat.com]? It's about a blogger's investigation (Ken White of the "Popehat" blog) of a blatant group of scammers who originally caught the eye of the author due to a bogus invoice. What's useful about it is that it provides an in-depth story of the author's investigative approach that accumulates online data, legal data, "tipsters", and even enemies of the targets, a series of shifty businesses which quickly started scamming across the US. While it's not clear if the author's efforts contributed (the official federal-level indictment took four and a half years after the author started collecting data), it does provide a blueprint for acting against anyone with illegal and fraudulent business practices.
He also quotes excerpts from legal testimony that document some genuine sociopathic behavior, particularly, something he called the "con-man lull" where the scammers would put off payment of checks (a key part of one branch of their scamming which involved a variety of payroll-based scams), sometimes successfully for months, coming up with one excuse after another. One of the scammers when confronted by an employee looking for a well overdue paycheck, wrote said check, and then put a stop on it the next day. He then made a check out for a sports car payment (which didn't bounce).