SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
US Uncut reports:
Some of the biggest pro-Bernie Sanders groups on Facebook were briefly taken down Monday evening in a targeted attack by Hillary Clinton supporters.
The groups Bernie Sanders Activists, Bernie Believers, BERNIE OR BUST, Bernie Sanders Revolutionaries, Bay Area for Bernie, Bernie Sanders 2016 — Ideas Welcome, Bernie Sanders is my HERO, and Bernie Sanders for President 2016 were all taken down in the attack. The pages in question were reported to be down for about three hours, from 9 p.m. to midnight Monday night.
Collectively, these groups are home to more than a quarter million Bernie Sanders supporters, and some have been in existence for nearly a year, having been launched shortly after the Vermont senator declared his intent to run for president in 2015.
The groups were targeted by online trolls, who posted pornographic images and reported the groups to Facebook admins.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by edIII on Wednesday April 27 2016, @08:34PM
Uhh, pictures of 16-18 year old girls willingly showing their newly developed and biologically adult bodies is nowhere near the same thing as prepubescent children being abused and photographed. If it's teenage guys doing it, well, I think they're far more interested in teenage girls seeing them then adult political supporters. I don't consider such things to be actual child porn, but young adults who don't yet legally qualify as a "full" adult in the legal sense. Therefore we treat a naked picture of a 17.999 year old girl to be exactly the same as a 6 year old girl, even though in another 24 hours that same girl is now making copyrighted and protected works that she can elect to sell. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense.
It may have been generated by teenage female supporters of Hillary as you may say (I don't see the male pictures actually happening), or it could have been some of her supporters in possession of child porn posting them. Quite frankly, I sincerely doubt that most teenage girls interested in politics are also interested in such debased tactics. From what I remember, girls were far more mature than boys. This is far more likely to have been conducted by adults (older and more bitter) that wished to, in no coincidence, to attack a group of political supporters on the eve of several important caucuses. To say that this was politically motivated teenagers is more than likely incorrect. Sounds like some adults wanted to play unfair in an election, and did exactly that.
What's good for goose is good for the gander though. I'm betting the Bernie supporters have more than enough IT going on to take out Hillary in a hot minute. That being said, I think we're above such debased tactics, and in fact, that's why were attempting to bring some sanity and integrity back into politics.
With appropriate campaign finance reforms, we could all put such nonsense to bed permanently for all sides of the political spectrum. Primarily because allowing the profits of these campaigns to enrich the media and Facebook is anathema to me. It should be a government run series of websites and media portals, that at worst, are leasing some technologies from Google/Facebook/Netflix/Amazon. Even that doesn't eliminate the possibility for corruption, but our current methodologies in fact engender it instead so anything is an improvement.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 27 2016, @11:06PM
Uhh, pictures of 16-18 year old girls willingly showing their newly developed and biologically adult bodies is nowhere near the same thing as prepubescent children being abused and photographed.
It is in the eyes of the law is all that matters in this context. Since you got that so wrong I TL;DR there rest of your rant.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anal Pumpernickel on Wednesday April 27 2016, @11:13PM
No, I don't think it is all that matters. The law can be wrong.