Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday April 29 2016, @08:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the they-have-nfi-how-they-did-it dept.

The Guardian is reporting that...

On Wednesday, the FBI confirmed it wouldn't tell Apple about the security flaw it exploited to break inside the iPhone 5C of San Bernardino gunman Syed Farook in part, because the bureau says it didn't buy the rights to the technical details of the hacking tool.

"Currently we do not have enough technical information about any vulnerability that would permit any meaningful review," said Amy Hess, the FBI's executive assistant director for science and technology.

$1.3m and no source code?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29 2016, @09:12AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29 2016, @09:12AM (#338821)

    Their response should be "ha ha fuck you", and not a single word more. Letting the world know that they can't do it again instantly was very weak.

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by maxwell demon on Friday April 29 2016, @09:16AM

    by maxwell demon (1608) on Friday April 29 2016, @09:16AM (#338822) Journal

    They didn't say they can't do it again, they only say they can't tell how it works.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    • (Score: 1) by hopp on Friday April 29 2016, @04:38PM

      by hopp (2833) on Friday April 29 2016, @04:38PM (#339023)

      If they can't tell how it works, how can they prove they did it?

      • (Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday April 29 2016, @07:47PM

        by maxwell demon (1608) on Friday April 29 2016, @07:47PM (#339122) Journal

        They got the data?

        I don't know how decoding mp3s works. And yet I can usually tell whether a program decoded an mp3 correctly.

        --
        The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
        • (Score: 2) by urza9814 on Friday April 29 2016, @08:41PM

          by urza9814 (3954) on Friday April 29 2016, @08:41PM (#339152) Journal

          They got *some* data. If they don't know how it works, they have no way to be certain that data wasn't completely fabricated. If you decode an MP3 and you get white noise, but you don't know what the MP3 was supposed to contain, is it decoded wrong or is it just a recording of white noise?

        • (Score: 2) by KiloByte on Friday April 29 2016, @09:42PM

          by KiloByte (375) on Friday April 29 2016, @09:42PM (#339196)

          They already had that data before -- the phone was unlocked when the FBI got it. It was only them carelessly (or perhaps even purposefully) messing with it that caused it to lock.

          The whole "locked phone" brouchacha was carefully tailored to produce a "werewolf case" -- it's hard to find a case with more public support than investigating a terrorist.

          --
          Ceterum censeo systemd esse delendam.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29 2016, @11:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 29 2016, @11:28AM (#338862)

    Or you know, they *can* do it again, but "improvements" made on devices newer than the 5c make it much easier.

    If that were the case, one would expect they would make a statement like, "We can't do this on newer devices, everybody please upgrade to a newer iPhone, you'll be safe lolz."