Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by LaminatorX on Thursday April 17 2014, @02:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the one-step-forward-two-steps-back dept.

While many will have forgotten about the steam explosion and subsequent graphite fire at the Chernobyl nuclear reactor in what is now Ukraine (and many readers won't have been born when it happened), there are still very many people working on making it environmentally safer than it would otherwise be, or were, up until a few days ago.

The damaged reactor was encased in a hastily built 'sarcophagus' to minimise the mixing of radioactive debris with the general environment, especially the dust. The 'sarcophagus' was showing signs of collapse, which would have released a considerable amount of radioactive dust, so as a co-operative endeavour between the Ukraine, the European Union and the USA, the Chernobyl Shelter Fund was set up in 1997 to create an environmentally safe confinement that would last at least 100 years.

The new, safe confinement structure is being built on rails to be moved over the existing buildings, and a major milestone in the project has been achieved this month, as the first half of the new structure has been built and moved into a holding position: that's 12,800 tonnes moved just over 100 metres sideways.

However, progress is threatened by Ukraine's political and economic crisis. Ukrainian officials say the project, originally scheduled for completion in 2015, will not be finished on time. Additionally, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, which partially funds the project, is not expecting contributions from Ukraine in the near term.

Edited to reflect stalled progress missed by the submitter.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by lx on Thursday April 17 2014, @02:45PM

    by lx (1915) on Thursday April 17 2014, @02:45PM (#32681)

    Crisis Compromises Chernobyl Cover Completion would have been headline perfection. Personally I would have gone with Crimea Crisis Compromises Critical Chernobyl Cover Completion but that might be a bit greedy.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Funny=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday April 17 2014, @07:08PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday April 17 2014, @07:08PM (#32790)

    Crimea Crisis Consequences Compromise Chernobyl Construction Cooperation, Callously Causing Critical Cover Completion Concerns.
    But what's the limit to title lengths?