SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Police in Peoria, IL raided the home of a 27 year-old resident who set up a parody Twitter account for the Peoria mayor. The raid did not result in any arrests, but computers and phones were seized and the residents questioned. The police are investigating the account for breaking a law forbidding "impersonating a public official". If the case moves forward, the alleged owner of the account, Michelle Pratt, could face a $2,500 fine and up to a year in jail.
Even if it is eventually dropped, this could have a chilling effect on satirical political speech and seems like a massive overstep by a local police force to save face for an elected official.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Fake Mayor Twitter Account Leads to Police Raid
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 23 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Bartman12345 on Thursday April 17 2014, @06:36PM
Since the account has now been disabled, it's now impossible to judge who is at fault here. Michelle says the site was an obvious fake, Settingsgaard says otherwise. If the account was indeed intended to give the impression that it was legit, then Michelle deserves everything she gets. I would be pissed if someone was impersonating me online, it would be worse for someone who is in the public eye constantly.
Michelle may, of course, be justified in her claim... but I have a feeling she may have pushed the envelope just a little too far. Time will tell.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by HiThere on Thursday April 17 2014, @07:38PM
Will it? Does she have enough money to fight the case? To me it looks like unjust repression, combined with theft (and probably wanton destruction) of personal property.
Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
(Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Thursday April 17 2014, @09:24PM
> Since the account has now been disabled, it's now impossible to judge who is at fault here.
Nope. I don't need to see the contents of the site to know that the people at fault here are the police, the judge who signed the warrant and the mayor who used the police as his personal attack dogs.
At most this should have been a civil complaint, the police should not have been involved. Just because there is a law on the books does not exculpate those who failed to use the discretion that the system has empowered them with.