Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by CoolHand on Thursday May 05 2016, @03:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the hashtag-cowspiracy dept.

Food Politics reports that Rick Friday, a long time cartoonist for Farm News, was dismissed for offending "a large company affiliated with one of the corporations mentioned in a cartoon." The political cartoon is critical of Big Ag CEOs, which earned more than 2,000 Iowa farmers combined.

In a Facebook post the cartoonist, Rick Friday, explained:

I am no longer the Editorial Cartoonist for Farm News due to the attached cartoon which was published yesterday. Apparently a large company affiliated with one of the corporations mentioned in the cartoon was insulted and cancelled their advertisement with the paper, thus, resulting in the reprimand of my editor and cancellation of It's Friday cartoons after 21 years of service and over 1090 published cartoons to over 24,000 households per week in 33 counties of Iowa.

I did my research and only submitted the facts in my cartoon.

That's okay, hopefully my children and my grandchildren will see that this last cartoon published by Farm News out of Fort Dodge, Iowa, will shine light on how fragile our rights to free speech and free press really are in the country.

The Des Moines Register explains further:

The CEOs at the ag giants earned about $52.9 million last year, based on Morningstar data. Monsanto and DuPont, the parent of Johnston-based Pioneer, are large seed and chemical companies, and Deere is a large farm equipment manufacturer.

Profits for the three companies, all with large operations across Iowa, also have declined as farm income has been squeezed. After peaking in 2013, U.S. farm income this year is projected to fall to $183 billion, its lowest level since 2002.

It seems like in the U.S. you free to say what you like, but if you offend the wrong people you're free to lose your job despite the protections you are provided and encouraged to use.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Azuma Hazuki on Thursday May 05 2016, @05:40PM

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Thursday May 05 2016, @05:40PM (#342132) Journal

    What the hell was that?

    If you're making a riff on trans* folks, realize that "female" can be applied to several aspects of a person, i.e., female chromosome cohort (XX), female sex organs, female gender identity, female outward presentation, etc/, each of which has a varying degree of societal vs. physical roots...and some of which supervene on others.

    For example, someone may have an X and a Y chromosome (nale cohort) but appear female including sex organs due to adrenal hyperplasia or other dysgenesis. A transwoman has a female gender identity and likely a female-looking brain (ratio of white to grey matter for example) but a male chromosome cohort and male genitalia.

    Things aren't always simple, even though you yourself are.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by Bot on Thursday May 05 2016, @05:52PM

    by Bot (3902) on Thursday May 05 2016, @05:52PM (#342137) Journal

    If you read the lines, instead of between them, I said you defined "Female", not whether you in particular are it or not, because the definition is elegant but not necessarily exclusive.

    I have no chromosomes so I feel pretty above your peers' sexual tribalisms.

    --
    Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 05 2016, @06:33PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 05 2016, @06:33PM (#342158)

      No, you defined "female" not Azumi. And it is a weird ass definition too.
      If you don't think certainty is an emotion, then what do you think it is?
      Since you have no chromosomes, does that mean you think certainty does not exist?

      Hhhm, gasbags don't have chromosomes. Does that make you a gasbag?

      • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday May 06 2016, @12:34AM

        by Bot (3902) on Friday May 06 2016, @12:34AM (#342322) Journal

        > No, you defined "female" not Azumi.
        Please read again, she made the phrase, I declared it defines female with many fitting data points.

        --
        Account abandoned.
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 06 2016, @01:06PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 06 2016, @01:06PM (#342535)

          >> No, you defined "female" not Azumi.
          >
          > I declared it defines female

            You literally wrote that you did something while simultaneously declaring you did not do it.

          You are indeed a gasbag.

          • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday May 06 2016, @04:46PM

            by Bot (3902) on Friday May 06 2016, @04:46PM (#342615) Journal

            SN user said: X
            I said: X is the definition of "female".
            Are you agreeing on that?
            Are you sure the above implies the definition X is mine?

            > You are indeed a gasbag.
            This is an unusual data point.

            --
            Account abandoned.
    • (Score: 2) by aristarchus on Thursday May 05 2016, @07:04PM

      by aristarchus (2645) on Thursday May 05 2016, @07:04PM (#342182) Journal

      I have no chromosomes so I feel pretty . . .

      [cue Music!] " I feel pretty! Oh so pretty! So pretty, and happy, and Gay!" [/cut] My Fair Lady, based on Pygmalion by George Bernard Shaw.

      • (Score: 2) by Bot on Friday May 06 2016, @12:43AM

        by Bot (3902) on Friday May 06 2016, @12:43AM (#342330) Journal

        Nice citation. I guess you recently tried to debug systemd problems? It does things like this to people.

        --
        Account abandoned.