Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Saturday May 07 2016, @04:54AM   Printer-friendly
from the industry-is-going-up-in-smoke dept.

U.S. to Crack Down on Tobacco, Electronic Cigarettes

NBC News and the Providence Journal report that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has published a rule which will classify cigars, chewing tobacco and nicotine-containing fluid for electronic cigarettes as tobacco products. Under the rule, sale of those items to people under 18 years of age is to be prohibited. The electronic parts of electronic cigarettes are not covered by the rule. According to NBC News, the rule "will be open for public comment before it becomes final." The FDA regulates cigarettes and loose tobacco for smoking.

[Continues...]

Courts in EU, India Uphold Anti-tobacco Laws

On 4 May the European Court of Justice turned down challenges to the 2014 revision of the Tobacco Products Directive. The law entails enlargement of warnings, prohibition of menthol cigarettes, prohibition of packages holding fewer than 20 cigarettes, restrictions on advertising of electronic cigarettes, and limits on the nicotine content of fluid for electronic cigarettes. It enables EU countries to require plain packaging. The court said the regulations were necessary to comply with the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.

Also on 4 May, India's Supreme Court declined to further delay the implementation of a requirement for larger warning messages on cigarette packages. Several cigarette manufacturers including ITC Ltd. have shut down their factories. The chairman of ITC decried the requirement, saying:

Behind this is vested interests... where money is given into the hands of so-called NGOs, who are being influenced to kill local brands knowing fully well that smuggled cigarettes of some other industry are going to be used here.

Golden Tobacco in Gujarat has been following the rule, which had originally been intended to take effect 1 April 2016, "from April 2015 [sic]."

coverage:

further information:


Original Submission #1  Original Submission #2 

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 07 2016, @07:08PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 07 2016, @07:08PM (#342966)

    It's also a complete violation of people's fundamental right to control their own bodies

    True, smoking is a complete violation of my right to not have to inhale a carcinogenic substance which makes me cough violently for minutes afterwards. It should be banned in all public spaces, including sidewalks.

    Oh wait, you're arguing against banning tobacco. All right then, carry on. I'll just keep convulsing every time I pass a smoker on the street and notice him too late to keep my breath for a minute.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Tork on Saturday May 07 2016, @09:55PM

    by Tork (3914) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 07 2016, @09:55PM (#343019) Journal
    I went to a movie a few weeks ago and the asshole next to me was vaping. I was recovering from a cold and every time he 'particulated' I went into a coughing fit. He didn't stop either, we watched the whole movie that way.

    I'm glad I quit smoking years ago. I like to think I'm not as oblivious as that dip in the theater, but still I must have been incredibly inconsiderate to others. I bet my neighbors weren't too fond of me.
    --
    🏳️‍🌈 Proud Ally 🏳️‍🌈 - Give us ribbiti or make us croak! 🐸
  • (Score: 2) by Anal Pumpernickel on Sunday May 08 2016, @10:50AM

    by Anal Pumpernickel (776) on Sunday May 08 2016, @10:50AM (#343155)

    True, smoking is a complete violation of my right to not have to inhale a carcinogenic substance which makes me cough violently for minutes afterwards.

    That could only be true when and if that event takes place. The mere act of smoking does not necessitate that you breathe it into your lungs, similar to how merely possessing a knife does not mean you will go out and murder someone with it.