SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the let-the-industrial-espionage-begin dept.
In February, two artists, Nora al-Badri and Jan Nikolai Nelles – claimed to have scanned the bust of Nefertiti in a German history museum using a handheld Kinect Sensor. They then posted the digital files online.
Their goal, they said, was to free the statue from its imprisonment inside the walls of Berlin's Neues Museum by enabling anyone with access to a 3D printer to make their own near-perfect replica – a Nefertiti for all.
Al-Badri and Nelles saw their caper as an act of cultural liberation. It was a gesture against what they believe to be a legacy of colonial theft and appropriation, in which the goods of one nation or culture – in this case, Egypt – ended up in the museums and storerooms of another.
But the stunt illustrated another possibility: the indirect heist. Instead of stealing the thing itself, you can just pilfer the set of parameters – the metadata – that define it.
Why steal the actual bust of Nefertiti when you can instead easily nab the measurements to fabricate a new one? You would not have the original but you would have the peculiar wealth that comes with possessing a potentially infinite number of exact copies.
[Related]: Cosmo Wenman has been scanning and releasing digital files of artefacts housed in the British Museum
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Thursday May 12 2016, @05:53AM
Theft involves depriving the owner of the property.
The Click-bait Headline gets it right, but not the actual article.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by maxwell demon on Thursday May 12 2016, @06:29AM
Also, heist is, by definition, a form of robbery, which, again by definition, involves violence. There's no indication they used any violence in their act.
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
(Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 12 2016, @06:33AM
You mean the museum was open at the time, nobody snuck in after hours, and there wasn't any heist at all?? SO LAME.
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday May 12 2016, @07:31AM
Hmm, this doesn't match my conception of the word. I feel like I've heard "heist" used in reference to burglaries before.
Merriam-Websters [merriam-webster.com] seems to think it applies to violent and nonviolent theft alike:
a : to commit armed robbery on
b : steal [merriam-webster.com]
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Thursday May 12 2016, @08:12AM
Silly Soylentis! "Heist" is just the past tense of "hoist", as in to pick something up. God knows where or when this became associated with crime? Was it those "stationary property" laws?
(Score: 2) by JNCF on Thursday May 12 2016, @08:29AM
I omitted that part from the quote, but it was the first definition given by Merriam-Webster. I don't think it's actually past tense (hoisted and heisted are both valid), but rather a cultural variation.