Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Thursday May 12 2016, @05:29AM   Printer-friendly
from the let-the-industrial-espionage-begin dept.

In February, two artists, Nora al-Badri and Jan Nikolai Nelles – claimed to have scanned the bust of Nefertiti in a German history museum using a handheld Kinect Sensor. They then posted the digital files online.

Their goal, they said, was to free the statue from its imprisonment inside the walls of Berlin's Neues Museum by enabling anyone with access to a 3D printer to make their own near-perfect replica – a Nefertiti for all.

Al-Badri and Nelles saw their caper as an act of cultural liberation. It was a gesture against what they believe to be a legacy of colonial theft and appropriation, in which the goods of one nation or culture – in this case, Egypt – ended up in the museums and storerooms of another.

But the stunt illustrated another possibility: the indirect heist. Instead of stealing the thing itself, you can just pilfer the set of parameters – the metadata – that define it.

Why steal the actual bust of Nefertiti when you can instead easily nab the measurements to fabricate a new one? You would not have the original but you would have the peculiar wealth that comes with possessing a potentially infinite number of exact copies.

https://www.newscientist.com/article/2087863-the-perfect-heists-that-involve-stealing-nothing-at-all/

[Related]: Cosmo Wenman has been scanning and releasing digital files of artefacts housed in the British Museum


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 12 2016, @02:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 12 2016, @02:45PM (#345238)

    but you would have the peculiar wealth that comes with possessing a potentially infinite number of exact copies.

    Which is, essentially, zero. Perhaps that's why it is a "peculiar" wealth.

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday May 12 2016, @04:33PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday May 12 2016, @04:33PM (#345299)

    Also, the number is as finite as your printing supplies.
    And the copies are not exact because of the scanning precision, capacity to capture/print colors, weight, and textures, and lack of actual access to all sides.

    But shiny 3D scanning makes great headlines.