SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the let-the-industrial-espionage-begin dept.
In February, two artists, Nora al-Badri and Jan Nikolai Nelles – claimed to have scanned the bust of Nefertiti in a German history museum using a handheld Kinect Sensor. They then posted the digital files online.
Their goal, they said, was to free the statue from its imprisonment inside the walls of Berlin's Neues Museum by enabling anyone with access to a 3D printer to make their own near-perfect replica – a Nefertiti for all.
Al-Badri and Nelles saw their caper as an act of cultural liberation. It was a gesture against what they believe to be a legacy of colonial theft and appropriation, in which the goods of one nation or culture – in this case, Egypt – ended up in the museums and storerooms of another.
But the stunt illustrated another possibility: the indirect heist. Instead of stealing the thing itself, you can just pilfer the set of parameters – the metadata – that define it.
Why steal the actual bust of Nefertiti when you can instead easily nab the measurements to fabricate a new one? You would not have the original but you would have the peculiar wealth that comes with possessing a potentially infinite number of exact copies.
[Related]: Cosmo Wenman has been scanning and releasing digital files of artefacts housed in the British Museum
(Score: 2) by darkfeline on Friday May 13 2016, @02:47AM
The statue is data in the simulator that is reality (e.g., a collection of quarks, leptons, bosons stored as an array in some hypothetical computer). So a scan could be considered metadata, much like the length of a music file is metadata for the actual music data in the file, the dimensions of the bust summarize the specific configuration of elementary particles that make up the bust.
Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
(Score: 2) by LoRdTAW on Friday May 13 2016, @06:52PM
That going a little deep and is a bit reaching. More philosophical than anything.
If you have an MP3, the actual audio you listen to is the data. The metadata is the title, artist, album, genre, etc. Same goes for video and pictures. What ever describes the data is metadata. A scan of a statue is a digital copy or rendition on the statue. I look at that as a snapshot of the matters volumetric state. That is what we as humans "see" and quantify. It does not describe the statue such as who it is a statue of, color, material, weight, size, smell, etc. A picture is just the state of reflected light as viewed by a camera. It doesn't tell you about the subject, location, etc.