Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Friday May 27 2016, @08:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the in-star-trek-every-planet-is-habitable dept.

Earlier this month, a team of astronomers from the University of Liège, Belgium, and NASA, using the TRAPPIST instrument at the ESO site in La Silla, Chile, discovered three exoplanets with temperatures similar to those of the Earth and Venus orbiting an ultra-cool M class dwarf star. M dwarves makes up approximately 75 percent of the stars in our galaxy, and this discovery greatly improves the potential for habitable exoplanets.

A recent study from the Imperial College of London, however, suggests that, whilst these planets orbit cooler and less luminous stars, they may still be too hot to be habitable for life as we know it. Dr James Owen, Hubble Fellow and lead author of the study states:

It was previously assumed that planets with masses similar to Earth would be habitable simply because they were in the 'habitable zone'. However, when you consider how these planets evolve over billions of years this assumption turns out not to be true.

The atmospheres of these exoplanets are estimated to make up rougly one percent of their planetary mass. By comparison, the mass of our atmosphere is roughly one millionth of the mass of our planet. This suggests an especially thick atmosphere which, given the resultant greenhouse effect, may render these exoplanets uninhabitable. Naturally, this problem is inherent of planets of Earth-like mass, or heavier; smaller planets, e.g. of Mars-like mass, may lose some of this atmospheric mass through evaporation, as we have observed in our own solar system. Further cataloging of the orbital systems of M class dwarf stars will identify these low mass exoplanets as candidates for the ongoing search for extra-solar life.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Friday May 27 2016, @06:08PM

    by deimtee (3272) on Friday May 27 2016, @06:08PM (#351709) Journal

    It may be that it narrows the habitable zone. Far enough out, the gases condense on the surface, and the place freezes. Close enough to vaporise and with a thick atmosphere it shoots all the way into Venus greenhouse territory.

    The abstract suggests that these planets would have far more massive atmospheres due to a mach larger H/He envelope during formation, which I assume would mean a primarily H/He atmosphere, which I wouldn't think would be a dramatic problem - since neither are greenhouse gasses they would if anything tend to be more opaque to incoming light than to escaping infrared/heat.

    Pretty much any gas is a greenhouse gas for some spectrum. Isn't a red dwarf likely to have a much higher infrared/visible light ratio anyway?

    --
    No problem is insoluble, but at Ksp = 2.943×10−25 Mercury Sulphide comes close.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2