Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday May 28 2016, @10:31PM   Printer-friendly
from the no-nonsense-oregonians dept.

El Reg reports

The US state of Oregon says it will charge Comcast tens of millions of dollars in taxes after revoking a tax break the cable giant had claimed on its broadband service.

The state's Department of Revenue (DOR) has denied a request by Comcast that it be granted an exemption reserved for companies that offer gigabit internet service in the state.

Written to lure Google's Fiber service to Portland after years of courtship, the tax break would give exemptions to reward the installation of high-speed fiber broadband.

Comcast [claimed] its "Gigabit Pro" service tops out at 2Gbit/s and thus made the cable giant eligible to claim the same breaks as Google.

The DOR, however, did not agree, and it ruled earlier this week that Comcast will have to pay the taxes.

[...] Critics of Comcast have previously argued that the Gigabit Pro service is prohibitively expensive (up to $4,600 a year) and only reaches a small number of Oregon residents.

[...] Both Google and Frontier also had their applications denied because neither has an active gigabit service in the state.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 29 2016, @05:48PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 29 2016, @05:48PM (#352304)

    I live in a rural area.

    There is, nominally, DSL. I had it for a while. It steadily got worse and worse until it would, without prior announcement, simply be offline for days at a time. Initially, when they installed the line, it was great, but they never maintained it.

    I'm sure they got their tax breaks and incentives for providing a service, but I ended up going satellite because it doesn't depend on a landline being maintained.

    I am thoroughly opposed to any subsidies that do not also stipulate a percentage of market penetration coupled with an SLA, independently audited, over a given timeframe. All figures to be publically available.