SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The show must go on:
The World Health Organization is trying to ease concerns about spreading Zika as a result of this summer's Olympics in Rio de Janiero.
"Based on current assessment, cancelling or changing the location of the 2016 Olympics will not significantly alter the international spread of Zika virus," a statement released Saturday reads.
This comes a day after more than 150 scientists released an open letter to the head of WHO calling for the games to be moved or postponed, citing new research. "We make this call despite the widespread fatalism that the Rio 2016 Games are inevitable or 'too big to fail,'" the letter says.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
World Health Organization Spurns Calls to Cancel or Move the Olympics Due to Zika
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 35 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
"I don't have to take this abuse from you -- I've got hundreds of
people waiting to abuse me."
-- Bill Murray, "Ghostbusters"
(Score: 3, Funny) by Runaway1956 on Monday May 30 2016, @09:34AM
Actually, the profitability of zika has already been taken into account. Not only will the health industry and the pharmaceuticals make a lot of money off of zika, but Microsoft stands to gain a lot if the world population of pinheads increases dramatically.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30 2016, @02:16PM
If I'm understanding correctly this is a virus that causes minor to no symptoms*, (and in fact has zero symptoms specific to it) except for a statistically significant correlation with birth defects. Also, it wasn't usual to check for this virus until a year ago, so I don't see how they are claiming a pandemic. This could be a normal seasonal thing that has always been going on:
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/03/23/science.aaf5036.full [sciencemag.org]
IE there is no evidence available that this virus is something to be concerned about.
*http://www.promedmail.org/direct.php?id=3370768
(Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday May 30 2016, @03:09PM
it's genetically engineered, to do exactly what it appears to be doing. The next generation is to be a bunch of pinheads, reliant on the nanny state. In fact, the state may hunt down and execute anyoen with an IQ over 70.
Sounds like the material for the next Soylent-Green-like science fiction movie.
Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
(Score: 2) by DECbot on Tuesday May 31 2016, @03:48PM
Aldous Huxley's Brave New World comes to mind. Somebody has to be happy to take out the garbage, sweep the streets, and input data into the database. Now take your soma and stop making a fuss--you're upsetting the nanny state.
cats~$ sudo chown -R us /home/base
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30 2016, @03:21PM
This actually isn't possible:
http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&Itemid=270&gid=32405&lang=en [paho.org]
So about 2.5% of people are defined to have microencephaly? This brings up the question of what percent of the microencephaly cases are actually disease states rather than just people happening to be low on the curve? I had assumed microencaphly was a serious problem before, now I am not sure that is always the case. Also do these means and sds take into account cultural and racial differences? Can immigration cause a pandemic of microencephaly using this definition?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30 2016, @04:12PM
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.7556/full [wiley.com]
Not a blinded study, but I'm surprised to see the majority of people diagnosed with this "disease" are apparently fine. It is more like if you devised a disease called hypo-pigmentation which included albinos that sometimes have associated problems but also includes those with less than 2 sds away from the average skin pigmentation.
...Even those emotional differences weren't very large (table 3). This is really starting to look shady.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30 2016, @05:22PM
To answer my question, yes this link may be due to ethnic differences, and demographic changes can alter microcephaly incidence in the absence of any disease at all:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7189556 [nih.gov]