The show must go on:
The World Health Organization is trying to ease concerns about spreading Zika as a result of this summer's Olympics in Rio de Janiero.
"Based on current assessment, cancelling or changing the location of the 2016 Olympics will not significantly alter the international spread of Zika virus," a statement released Saturday reads.
This comes a day after more than 150 scientists released an open letter to the head of WHO calling for the games to be moved or postponed, citing new research. "We make this call despite the widespread fatalism that the Rio 2016 Games are inevitable or 'too big to fail,'" the letter says.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 30 2016, @03:49PM
Really? Some people find a small correlation between two poorly defined things (zika virus infection and microcephaly) that are difficult to measure and everyone should just stop what they are doing because of it. Further those people are asking us accept to that they invert the usual burden of scientific proof:
http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_view&Itemid=270&gid=32405&lang=en [paho.org]
So set up vague hypothesis like "zika go up means microcephaly go up", and you are set. 50/50 chance everyone will need to accept your hypothesis.