Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Thursday June 02 2016, @03:40AM   Printer-friendly
from the quick-to-censor dept.

We have heard the rumblings, now it comes.... the Code of Conduct for social media along with the banhammer.

From Bloomberg we get this warning:

U.S. Internet giants Facebook Inc., Twitter Inc., Google and Microsoft Corp. pledged to tackle online hate speech in less than 24 hours as part of a joint commitment with the European Union to combat the use of social media by terrorists.

Of course terrorists are defined down to "unambiguous hate speech that they said promoted racism, homophobia or anti-Semitism" before the short article ends.

Buckle up folks, the ride is is about to get bumpy.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gravis on Thursday June 02 2016, @05:43AM

    by Gravis (4596) on Thursday June 02 2016, @05:43AM (#353861)

    Here's the problem with the concept of hate speech: who decides?

    well in this particular case, it's a program that will decide. a rudimentary approach would be to find the liberal overuse of terms deemed to be offensive to trigger a reactionary ban hammer response. however, google has been investing seriously in AI development and language processing, so they may begin leveraging that to identify trends in posts and post responses that correlate with hate speech. frankly, i don't think they should be banned because that is an ineffective way of stopping bigots. reddit's "shadow ban" system is an improvement but i think we could do much better. instead of a simple shadow ban, you could create a shadow social network where people respond to your posts... except they aren't people, they are actually just AIs. the idea is to keep hate mongers engaged so that you waste their time and keeping their hateful posts hidden from the world. this way, they won't simply post their hate somewhere else but will waste all their time in a fantasy world.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 02 2016, @10:01AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 02 2016, @10:01AM (#353956)

    ...to keep hate mongers engaged so that you waste their time and keeping their hateful posts hidden from the world. this way, they won't simply post their hate somewhere else but will waste all their time in a fantasy world.

    A network of interconnected computers used to be a great "fantasy world." You could sit at your machine and type whatever you wanted and engage in interesting discussions with people you'd ordinarily never meet.

    Even if you didn't actually 100% believe the side you were championing, it was fun to participate in a wide variety of unusual conversations.

    When I first started using a BBS in the 1990s I met my first "different" people (wiccans, pagans, homosexuals, etc.) They found a place to communicate and share their "otherness." I learned quite a bit through the experience. They/we were all vaguely afraid of having our discussion crunched under some right-wing totalitarian boot. We'd have never believed the boot would come, but that it would be on the left foot instead.

    That "fantasy world" is gone now, and I'll bet most people under 30 could hardly believe such a place ever existed the way it did.

    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Thursday June 02 2016, @01:12PM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Thursday June 02 2016, @01:12PM (#354036) Journal

      That "fantasy world" is gone now, and I'll bet most people under 30 could hardly believe such a place ever existed the way it did.

      It was that way once, and it can be again. But we have to make it so.

      Let's recall though that at the time of the BBS'es it was at the tail-end of the 80's, the Reagan years, with all of its in-your-face machismo, war mongering, Christian Right Triumphalism. The BBS'es were themselves an escape from that daily reality. It was the nerds like us that built those and grew them into the Internet. We were the vanguard of greater freedom then, and we can still be if we choose to.

      The people that discourage the stuff we create and discourage freedom of speech and all other aspects of freedom are stupid, reactionary, and slow. They used to have us on muscle, but now that we have robots, it's possible for us to create a future where we're not out-muscled either. Having lots of money is what they still have, so a good step toward taking their power away would be to find ways to make their money meaningless.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Thursday June 02 2016, @02:30PM

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 02 2016, @02:30PM (#354069) Homepage Journal

      " We'd have never believed the boot would come, but that it would be on the left foot instead."

      Spread the word, far and wide. The left really isn't very different from the right. https://casescorner.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/boot_govmnt_l-r-nodiff_onblk_248x246.png?w=248&h=246 [wordpress.com]

      --
      Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday June 02 2016, @02:20PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 02 2016, @02:20PM (#354062) Homepage Journal

    A program decides. So - we have a working artificial intelligence now? FFS man - the program is going to spit out the answers that the PROGRAMMERS designed it to spit. So, what you really have, are some special snowflakes dictating how you may express yourself by proxy.

    Get the flamethrower, we've got some snowflakes to take care of.

    --
    Abortion is the number one killed of children in the United States.