A PhD student who shot and killed a professor before killing himself claimed that the professor had stolen his code:
The student who shot and killed his engineering professor and then himself at a Los Angeles university had accused the professor of stealing his code.
In a blog post on March 10, Mainak Sarkar, 38, said Professor William Klug, 39, "is not the kind of person when you think of a professor. He is a very sick person. I urge every new student coming to UCLA to stay away from this guy." He continued: "I was this guy's PhD student. We had personal differences. He cleverly stole all my code and gave it another student. He made me really sick. Your enemy is your enemy. But your friend can do a lot more harm. Be careful about whom you trust. Stay away from this sick guy." The post has since been taken down.
On Wednesday, nearly three months after posting it, and seemingly upset at poor grades, Sarkar drove from his home in Minnesota to Los Angeles where he confronted and gunned down Professor Klug at the university's engineering complex. Sarkar then turned the gun on himself and killed himself. The Los Angeles Times quoted an unnamed UCLA source as saying the allegation that Klug stole his student's code was "absolutely untrue."
The professor's name was found on a "kill list" written by Sarkar, along with another professor who wasn't on campus at the time of the shooting and has been confirmed to be safe. Sarkar reportedly killed his estranged wife in Minnesota before traveling to UCLA. Also at Los Angeles Times , The New York Times , CNN.
(Score: 5, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 03 2016, @09:06PM
This UCLA shooter was a Muslim immigrant here on a student visa.
Cultural illiteracy FTL!
Sarkar [ancestry.com] is a Bengali Hindu family name.
Mainak [indiachildnames.com] is also a Hindu name.
So he's probably not muslim. But there are like 1.3 billion muslims in the world, sooo it wouldn't have been very relevant if he were either.
Damn the leftist disinformationists and the propaganda TFA rode in on. Distractions like this often have a small bit of truth that leads you towards flawed conclusions or otherwise mask the reality of the situation. You better start believing in shill threads, because you're in one.
Uh, OK.