Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Wednesday June 15 2016, @11:33AM   Printer-friendly
from the did-they-get-the-size-on-Hillary's-pant-suits? dept.

Two separate groups of Russian hackers have reportedly had their way with the Democratic National Committee's network for months... up until last weekend:

Russian hackers have been accessing the Democratic National Committee's computer network for the past year, and have stolen information including opposition research files on presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump.

According to CrowdStrike, the security firm the DNC called in to deal with the massive data breach, one group of hackers tied to the Russian government has been stealing information from the national party for about a year. "They infiltrated the DNC's network last summer and were monitoring their communications, their email servers, and the like," company co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch told NPR.

A second group, also tied to Russia, accessed the DNC's network in April. "They went straight for the research department of the DNC and exfiltrated opposition materials on Mr. Trump," Alperovitch said.

The Washington Post first reported the DNC break-in.

CrowdStrike doesn't believe the two distinct groups of Russian hackers — which the company has internally nicknamed COZY BEAR and FANCY BEAR — collaborated with each other. "Instead," company co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch wrote in a lengthy blog post, "we observed the two Russian espionage groups compromise the same systems and engage separately in the theft of identical credentials."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 15 2016, @10:51PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 15 2016, @10:51PM (#360788)

    On one hand you maximize the effort when describing doing your job: "really sub-optimal most of the time."
    And on the other hand you trivialize the effort of the user doing your job: "a bit of common sense."

    And the "my fees would go up" argument says you are happy doing a poor job as long as you get paid.
    I recognize that a guy's gotta eat. But when you make that argument it is dishonest to then shift the responsibility away from your role as the person hired for their expertise.