Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday June 16 2016, @10:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the less-selective-selective-service dept.

The U.S. Senate has passed a provision that would require women to register for the draft, but don't expect any changes soon:

On Tuesday, the Senate passed a defense authorization bill that would require young women to register for the draft — the latest development in a long-running debate over whether women should sign up for the Selective Service. The provision would apply to women turning 18 in 2018 or later and would impose the same requirements and rules that currently apply to men.

The policy is still far from being law. The House, after considering a similar provision earlier this spring, ultimately passed an authorization bill that omitted it; the two branches of Congress now must resolve the differences between their bills. And the bill faces a veto threat from President Obama over other elements of the legislation, such as the prohibition on closing down the Guantanamo Bay military prison. But the bill's passage brings women a step closer to Selective Service registration — a historic change that has bipartisan support in Congress but is firmly opposed by some conservative lawmakers.

For decades, the U.S. policy of having a draft for men, and not women, was approved as constitutional by the Supreme Court. But as NPR's David Welna reported last year, the court's reasoning relied on the fact that women were barred from combat roles. Now that women are eligible for combat duty, "Congress seems to have lost its court-endorsed rationale for limiting Selective Service registration to males only," David wrote.

Previously: Women Warriors Coming Soon to US Forces


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 16 2016, @03:13PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 16 2016, @03:13PM (#361071)

    While all true, they are not going to re-implement a draft, probably ever. The volunteer system is working in the sense that they have enough people to fill their needs. It would take a WWII-level of personnel involvement before they start needing very large pools of people.

    There are very good arguments for requiring people to serve in the military, because it means people have skin in the game. When there's discussion of sending troops somewhere, it makes more of a difference if your son or daughter will be sent over. Just like the concept of public transit; people greatly support the idea that YOU should use it, but, you know, as much as I'd LOVE to use it all the time, it just isn't convenient for me. No public sacrifice means indifference to policy.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1