Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday April 21 2014, @08:21PM   Printer-friendly
from the conclusions-would-damage-the-economy dept.

Biofuels have direct, fuel-cycle GHG emissions that are typically 30-90% lower than those for gasoline or diesel fuels. However, since for some biofuels indirect emissions-including from land use change-can lead to greater total emissions than when using petroleum products, policy support needs to be considered on a case by case basis.

The IPCC has released a finalized draft of its Working Group III report. Sourced from Forbes, their analysis: that ethanol is worse than petroleum. The Working Group itself managed to say... Well, after a quick read-through of chapter 8, it appears they managed to keep any actual meaning occluded by a thick screen of political double-speak. So, I guess they said whatever you would like them to have said since nobody can prove any different.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by geek on Monday April 21 2014, @08:33PM

    by geek (3368) on Monday April 21 2014, @08:33PM (#34138) Homepage

    "Well, after a quick read-through of chapter 8, it appears they managed to keep any actual meaning occluded by a thick screen of political double-speak. So, I guess they said whatever you would like them to have said since nobody can prove any different."

    If I wanted stupid editorial narrative I'd still be on slashdot.

  • (Score: 2) by mendax on Monday April 21 2014, @08:39PM

    by mendax (2840) on Monday April 21 2014, @08:39PM (#34143)

    I still read Slashdot. Why not receive the corporate view of things, at least from Dice's perspective?

    --
    It's really quite a simple choice: Life, Death, or Los Angeles.
  • (Score: 2) by frojack on Monday April 21 2014, @08:41PM

    by frojack (1554) Subscriber Badge on Monday April 21 2014, @08:41PM (#34146) Journal

    On the other hand, this isn't the first study that indicated that Ethanol increases net energy cost , and decreases mileage while increasing pollution, and increasing food costs.

    So regardless how they want to word it, the story is not new.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by captain normal on Monday April 21 2014, @08:55PM

    by captain normal (2205) on Monday April 21 2014, @08:55PM (#34152)

    I'd hardly call his comment "stupid". If you really can't stand any comment by any submitter or editor, you could bring this up in one of the forums. If you simply think his comment was wrong, you could point out why you think that is so.
    I really try to avoid feeding the trolls, but as you are not AC, you probably are motivated to participate in a group discussion. Best way to get your point across is to avoid insulting and derogatory remarks.

    --
    "It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince them that they have been fooled" Mark Twain