When Michael Young, a British sociologist, coined the term meritocracy in 1958, it was in a dystopian satire. At the time, the world he imagined, in which intelligence fully determined who thrived and who languished, was understood to be predatory, pathological, far-fetched.
Today, however, we’ve almost finished installing such a system, and we have embraced the idea of a meritocracy with few reservations, even treating it as virtuous. That can’t be right. Smart people should feel entitled to make the most of their gift. But they should not reshape society so as to instate giftedness as a universal yardstick of human worth.
(Score: 2) by Aiwendil on Sunday June 19 2016, @01:43PM
Was in part an attempt at humor, in part in that the PM in Canada actually has at least some education in STEM..
But if you want a serious answer: Singapore
(and let's not forget that germany's Merkel is a trained scientist (chemistry research))