Dozens of U.S. diplomats have urged bombings of President Bashar Assad's forces in Syria in order to make him more likely to step down. The memo, sent to U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, was not necessarily intended to be public, and was sent through a "dissent channel":
More than 50 U.S. State Department officials have signed an internal memo calling for a change in the way the United States approaches Syria — specifically, advocating military pressure on Bashar Assad's regime to push him toward the negotiating table.
The diplomats expressed their opposition to the current U.S. policy through a cable on the State Department's dissent channel — which exists for just that reason. But NPR's Michele Kelemen reports that it's unusual for so many officials to sign on to such a cable. "Secretary of State John Kerry says he respects the process and will study their views," Michele tells our Newscast unit.
"The cable reportedly calls for targeted military strikes against the Assad regime, something the Obama administration has been reluctant to do," she reports. "Such action would also put the U.S. on a collision course with Russia at a time that Moscow is backing the Assad regime — and working with Secretary Kerry on a cease-fire and a diplomatic path that has faltered."
The New York Times , which has seen a copy of the memo, reports that the diplomats say they aren't advocating a confrontation with Russia. But a credible military threat against Assad is necessary to pressure him to negotiate, the officials argue. "The moral rationale for taking steps to end the deaths and suffering in Syria, after five years of brutal war, is evident and unquestionable. ... The status quo in Syria will continue to present increasingly dire, if not disastrous, humanitarian, diplomatic and terrorism-related challenges," the cable says, according to the Times.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by tisI on Sunday June 19 2016, @12:49AM
That's why the US is funding and arming ISIS.
Think back a couple years. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend" logic. Yep that one. It's back.
Think of it this way:
The US and the USSR are having a chess match and the game is ISIS vs. Assad.
The US is backing OUR favorite terrorist organization and the Soviets are backing their friends in Syria.
It's a proxy war. Much like the 80's when Raygun was selling both Iraq and Iran boatloads of bullets, bombs and WMDs, so they could fight it out amongst themselves, for whatever end Raygun felt.
The end game here is control over supply of natural gas to Europe. The Soviet Union currently supplies Europe.
Corporate America wants to interfere with that notion and Syria stands in the way of C.A.
The Soviet Union is also not much of a fan of Corporate America's intentions.
Clear as mud?
"Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself."