SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Scottish nationals have two supra-national citizenships. One is UK citizenship, the second is EU citizenship. In democratic referenda over the past two years, Scots have voted clearly to retain both citizenships.
Unfortunately it is not possible to respect both democratic decisions of the Scottish people, due to a vote by other nationalities. So where you have democratic decisions which cannot both be implemented, which does democracy demand should take precedence?
It is not a simple question. The vote to retain EU citizenship was more recent and carried a much larger majority than the earlier vote. In addition it was made crystal clear during the campaign that it may require the overturning of the earlier vote. So on these grounds I believe the most recent vote must, as an exercise in democracy, have precedence.
In these circumstances the announcement by the First Minister that she is initiating the procedure on a new referendum for Scottish independence from the UK, in order to retain Scottish membership of the EU, is a sensible step.
Source: Craig Murray
Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster and human rights activist. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004 and Rector of the University of Dundee from 2007 to 2010.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 25 2016, @02:41PM
in the last paragraph, replace Scotland by UK and UK by EU and you have almost the same description... just add also the emigration, but that is due London being rich and a magnet to attract poor people trying to change their life. Leaving the EU will not truly fix that, no matter what nationalists say, unless London stop being rich... but i suspect that this may be a undesired goal
(Score: 2) by Dunbal on Saturday June 25 2016, @02:44PM
No it's not the same, because an Englishman cannot become President of Bulgaria.