Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday July 01 2016, @01:49AM   Printer-friendly
from the Pay-attention! dept.

Two Soylentils wrote in with news of a fatal accident involving a Tesla vehicle. Please note that the feature in use, called "Autopilot" is not the same as an autonomous vehicle. It provides lane-keeping, cruise control, and safe-distance monitoring, but the driver is expected to be alert and in control at all times. -Ed.

Man Killed in Crash of 'Self-Driving' Car

Tech Insider reports that an Ohio man was killed on 7 May when his Tesla Model S, with its autopilot feature turned on, went under a tractor-trailer.

Further information:

Tesla Autopilot - Fatal Accident

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/30/us-regulators-investigating-tesla-over-use-of-automated-system-linked-to-fatal-crash.html

Accident is reported to have happened in May, and reported to NHTSA/DOT immediately by Tesla. But not public until the end of June -- something a bit fishy about this reporting lag.

On the other hand, the accident is described as one that might have also been difficult for an alert human to have avoided:

The May crash occurred when a tractor trailer drove across a divided highway, where a Tesla in autopilot mode was driving. The Model S passed under the tractor trailer, and the bottom of the trailer hit the Tesla vehicle's windshield.

"Neither Autopilot nor the driver noticed the white side of the tractor trailer against a brightly lit sky, so the brake was not applied," Tesla wrote.

This was the first reporting found--by the time it makes the SN front page there may be more details. Because this is a "first" it seems likely that a detailed investigation and accident reconstruction will be performed.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by frojack on Friday July 01 2016, @05:26PM

    by frojack (1554) Subscriber Badge on Friday July 01 2016, @05:26PM (#368503) Journal

    I assure you GHZ radar in cars is not 10s of thousands of dollars. Its usually included in a Safety Tech option package that includes backup cams, blindspot detection, adaptive cruise control and front collision avoidance.

    Usually that whole package goes for something in the neighborhood of $2000 to $2500 additional, which you may well recover in lower insurance premiums if you keep the car 5 years.

    Lots of different car companies are offering this package, which is available from three or four third parties. (Almost no car manufacturer develops their own).

    The quality of the programming has improved dramatically over the last decade. I did quite a bit of research on this when buying my last car.

    Lane following is usually done with cameras, because the radar does not see paint well, and paint is poorly maintained. My friend's beamer with lane following often gets confused and alarms. He considers it an annoyance.

    --
    No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3