SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the those-who-can,-do,-those-who-can't,-teach dept.
In the US: this article presents an analysis how a person's chosen college major corresponds to their IQ. The interesting thing is that the relationship has remained essentially stable over the past 70 years. At the top of the list are math, science and engineering. At the absolute bottom of the list: education.
These data show that US students who choose to major in education, essentially the bulk of people who become teachers, have for at least the last seven decades been selected from students at the lower end of the academic aptitude pool. A 2010 McKinsey report (pdf) by Byron Auguste, Paul Kihn, and Matt Miller noted that top performing school systems, such as those in Singapore, Finland, and South Korea, "recruit 100% of their teacher corps from the top third of the academic cohort."
The article points out that it isn't quite this simple: Top schools place high requirements on all of their students; poor schools generally attract lower quality students in all of their programs. Still, the national averages are clear: overall, the least intelligent students go on to teach. This is an odd priority.
Educational organizations, of course, have a different view. This article claims that teacher quality declined from the 1960s through the 1990s, but has since recovered, with teachers being barely below average (48th percentile) among college graduates.
On a related note, there is a strong international correlation between teacher pay and student outcomes. The (rather obvious) theory is that higher pay attracts better candidates to the teaching profession.
No conclusions - just thought this might spark an interesting discussion...
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 01 2016, @03:19PM
All my teachers throughout my entire school career either had a much lower IQ (thirty points less at least) than I did or they hid it damned well. Once I hit middle school they were largely just taking up space and keeping the room quiet so I could nap.
Its laughable that you think you can literally measure the IQs of people just by seeing them in one specific context. You talk like you never matured past middle school.
When everybody else is the problem...
(Score: 3, Insightful) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday July 01 2016, @03:24PM
If you can't tell if someone's bloody stupid over the span of nine months, I can already tell where you fall in the distribution curve.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Friday July 01 2016, @08:47PM
... I can already tell where you fall in the distribution curve.
Speaking of inability to detect stupidity...
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday July 01 2016, @09:21PM
Nah, I detected yours long ago. Somewhat above average intelligence with delusions of grandeur and a pathological inability to see the world as it actually is.
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 2) by Tork on Friday July 01 2016, @09:28PM
....delusions of grandeur...
Conceded.
...and a pathological inability to see the world as it actually is.
That's rich coming from a guy who's view of the world could losslessly fit within a 1-bit .BMP file.
Slashdolt Logic: "25 year old jokes about sharks and lasers are +5, Funny." 💩